Abstract
In componential analysis, word meanings are (partly) decomposed into other meanings, and semantic and syntactic markers. Although a theory of word meaning based on such semantic decompositions remains compatible with the linguistic labor division thesis, it is not compatible with Kripke/Putnam-style indexical externalism. Instead of abandoning indexical externalism, a Separation Thesis is defended according to which lexical meaning need not enter the truth-conditional content of an utterance. Lexical meaning reflects beliefs about word meaning shared in a speaker community, and these may rest on possibly erroneous world-level theories. It is argued that this type of lexical meaning is indispensable for explaining word composition processes and the rationality of metalinguistic disputes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 65–85 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Linguistics and Philosophy |
| Volume | 46 |
| Early online date | 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- Componential analysis
- Lexical meaning
- Metalinguistic negotiation
- Semantic externalism
- Semantic internalism
- Twin Earth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Metalinguistic disputes, semantic decomposition, and externalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver