TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanistic Modeling of Radium-223 Treatment of Bone Metastases
AU - Moreira, Hugo M. R.
AU - Guerra Liberal, Francisco D. C.
AU - O'Sullivan, Joe M.
AU - McMahon, Stephen J.
AU - Prise, Kevin M.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - Purpose: Despite the effectiveness of 223 RaCl 2 for treating patients with symptomatic bone metastatic disease, its mechanisms of action are still unclear. Even established dosimetric approaches differ considerably in their conclusions. In silico tumor models bring a new perspective to this situation because they can quantitatively simulate the interaction of α-particles with the target(s). Here, we investigated 3 different mathematical models of tumor growth that consider the radiation effect of radium-223 ( 223 Ra) treatments and compared the results with clinical data. Methods and Materials: The well-established Gompertz growth model was applied to simulate metastatic tumor burden. On the basis of published measurements of 223 Ra uptake, we have incorporated the radiation effect of α-particles into the model and investigated 3 radium distribution scenarios—uniform exposure, exposure of only an outer layer, and exposure of a constant volume of the tumor. For each scenario, the times for various tumor stages to progress to the first symptomatic skeletal event were calculated. Results: Uniform and outer-layer exposure scenarios showed very poor agreement with the Kaplan-Meier patient curves from clinical data. However, the constant-volume effect predicted outcomes very similar to the observed clinical results, suggesting, depending on the dose rate, that relatively small fractions of the cell population see damage from 223 Ra. Conclusions: The commonly used assumption of uniform 223 Ra distribution does not accurately reflect clinical responses. The suggestion that only a subpopulation of the tumor might be affected by 223 Ra shows a pressing need to further study the tumor and drug kinetics to schedule more effective treatments in the future.
AB - Purpose: Despite the effectiveness of 223 RaCl 2 for treating patients with symptomatic bone metastatic disease, its mechanisms of action are still unclear. Even established dosimetric approaches differ considerably in their conclusions. In silico tumor models bring a new perspective to this situation because they can quantitatively simulate the interaction of α-particles with the target(s). Here, we investigated 3 different mathematical models of tumor growth that consider the radiation effect of radium-223 ( 223 Ra) treatments and compared the results with clinical data. Methods and Materials: The well-established Gompertz growth model was applied to simulate metastatic tumor burden. On the basis of published measurements of 223 Ra uptake, we have incorporated the radiation effect of α-particles into the model and investigated 3 radium distribution scenarios—uniform exposure, exposure of only an outer layer, and exposure of a constant volume of the tumor. For each scenario, the times for various tumor stages to progress to the first symptomatic skeletal event were calculated. Results: Uniform and outer-layer exposure scenarios showed very poor agreement with the Kaplan-Meier patient curves from clinical data. However, the constant-volume effect predicted outcomes very similar to the observed clinical results, suggesting, depending on the dose rate, that relatively small fractions of the cell population see damage from 223 Ra. Conclusions: The commonly used assumption of uniform 223 Ra distribution does not accurately reflect clinical responses. The suggestion that only a subpopulation of the tumor might be affected by 223 Ra shows a pressing need to further study the tumor and drug kinetics to schedule more effective treatments in the future.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062389506&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.015
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 30557674
AN - SCOPUS:85062389506
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 103
SP - 1221
EP - 1230
JO - International Journal Of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal Of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 5
ER -