TY - JOUR
T1 - Mapping variability in allocation of long-term care funds across payer agencies in OECD countries
AU - Waitzberg, Ruth
AU - Schmidt, Andrea E.
AU - Blümel, Miriam
AU - Penneau, Anne
AU - Farmakas, Antonis
AU - Ljungvall, Åsa
AU - Barbabella, Francesco
AU - Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo
AU - Marchildon, Gregory P.
AU - Saunes, Ingrid Sperre
AU - Vočanec, Dorja
AU - Miloš, Iva
AU - Contel, Joan Carles
AU - Murauskiene, Liubove
AU - Kroneman, Madelon
AU - Tambor, Marzena
AU - Hroboň, Pavel
AU - Wittenberg, Raphael
AU - Allin, Sara
AU - Or, Zeynep
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Introduction: Long-term care (LTC) is organized in a fragmented manner. Payer agencies (PA) receive LTC funds from the agency collecting funds, and commission services. Yet, distributional equity (DE) across PAs, a precondition to geographical equity of access to LTC, has received limited attention. We conceptualize that LTC systems promote DE when they are designed to set eligibility criteria nationally (vs. locally); and to distribute funds among PAs based on needs-formula (vs. past-budgets or government decisions). Objectives: This cross-country study highlights to what extent different LTC systems are designed to promote DE across PAs, and the parameters used in allocation formulae. Methods: Qualitative data were collected through a questionnaire filled by experts from 17 OECD countries. Results: 11 out of 25 LTC systems analyzed, fully meet DE as we defined. 5 systems which give high autonomy to PAs have designs with low levels of DE; while nine systems partially promote DE. Allocation formulae vary in their complexity as some systems use simple demographic parameters while others apply socio-economic status, disability, and LTC cost variations. Discussion and conclusions: A minority of LTC systems fully meet DE, which is only one of the criteria in allocation of LTC resources. Some systems prefer local priority-setting and governance over DE. Countries that value DE should harmonize the eligibility criteria at the national level and allocate funds according to needs across regions.
AB - Introduction: Long-term care (LTC) is organized in a fragmented manner. Payer agencies (PA) receive LTC funds from the agency collecting funds, and commission services. Yet, distributional equity (DE) across PAs, a precondition to geographical equity of access to LTC, has received limited attention. We conceptualize that LTC systems promote DE when they are designed to set eligibility criteria nationally (vs. locally); and to distribute funds among PAs based on needs-formula (vs. past-budgets or government decisions). Objectives: This cross-country study highlights to what extent different LTC systems are designed to promote DE across PAs, and the parameters used in allocation formulae. Methods: Qualitative data were collected through a questionnaire filled by experts from 17 OECD countries. Results: 11 out of 25 LTC systems analyzed, fully meet DE as we defined. 5 systems which give high autonomy to PAs have designs with low levels of DE; while nine systems partially promote DE. Allocation formulae vary in their complexity as some systems use simple demographic parameters while others apply socio-economic status, disability, and LTC cost variations. Discussion and conclusions: A minority of LTC systems fully meet DE, which is only one of the criteria in allocation of LTC resources. Some systems prefer local priority-setting and governance over DE. Countries that value DE should harmonize the eligibility criteria at the national level and allocate funds according to needs across regions.
KW - Allocation formula
KW - Equity
KW - Funds allocation
KW - Long-term care
KW - Payer agencies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081891951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851020300488?via%3Dihub
U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.013
DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.013
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32197994
AN - SCOPUS:85081891951
SN - 0168-8510
VL - 124
SP - 491
EP - 500
JO - Health Policy
JF - Health Policy
IS - 5
ER -