TY - JOUR
T1 - Looking at team improvised adaptation through a paradoxical lens
T2 - The role of team plasticity
AU - Abrantes, António C.M.
AU - Passos, Ana M.
AU - Cunha, Miguel P.e.
AU - Silva, Sílvia A.da
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by National Funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia [grant no. UID/ECO/00124/2013]; and the POR Lisboa [grant no. LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007722].
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - When time is of the essence and teams face unexpected contextual changes, they must adapt quickly, sometimes even in real time, that is, they may have to improvise. This paper adopts an inductive approach to explore how teams decide to engage in improvised adaptation, and what happens during those processes for improvisation to be successful. The study analyzes improvisation from the perspective of paradox theory and identifies six paradoxical tensions driven by these contexts: deployment, development, temporal, procedural, structural, and behavioral tensions. We propose a dynamic equilibrium model of team improvised adaptation that leads to team plasticity. By properly managing the paradoxical tensions emerging from the convergence of design and execution, teams become more plastic and able to cope with sudden change. These findings contribute to adaptation and improvisation literatures by delving into the adaptation process under the temporal and material confluence of design and execution.
AB - When time is of the essence and teams face unexpected contextual changes, they must adapt quickly, sometimes even in real time, that is, they may have to improvise. This paper adopts an inductive approach to explore how teams decide to engage in improvised adaptation, and what happens during those processes for improvisation to be successful. The study analyzes improvisation from the perspective of paradox theory and identifies six paradoxical tensions driven by these contexts: deployment, development, temporal, procedural, structural, and behavioral tensions. We propose a dynamic equilibrium model of team improvised adaptation that leads to team plasticity. By properly managing the paradoxical tensions emerging from the convergence of design and execution, teams become more plastic and able to cope with sudden change. These findings contribute to adaptation and improvisation literatures by delving into the adaptation process under the temporal and material confluence of design and execution.
KW - paradox theory
KW - team adaptation
KW - team improvisation
KW - team improvised adaptation
KW - team plasticity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119136349&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00218863211037441
DO - 10.1177/00218863211037441
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85119136349
SN - 0021-8863
VL - 59
SP - 88
EP - 126
JO - The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
JF - The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
IS - 1
ER -