Long-term effects

Social revolution and civil society in Portugal, 1974-2010

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Do democratic social revolutions strengthen civil society in the long-run? We answer this question by comparing the trajectories of three civil society sectors (social welfare organizations, neighborhood associations, and unions) in democratic Portugal. We argue that the degree of inclusiveness of the institutions of the previous authoritarian regime shaped the type of revolutionary elites available for alliances with civil society during the revolutionary crisis. More inclusionary authoritarian institutions promoted the emergence of a more pluralistic opposition to the dictatorship, thus generating future revolutionary leaderships prone to empowering emerging popular civil society organizations. Inversely, exclusionary and repressive institutions spawned a narrow and secretive opposition and subsequent revolutionary elite bent on hierarchical topdown control thereby disempowering civil society in the long-run.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-431
Number of pages21
JournalComparative Politics
Volume49
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

social effects
Portugal
civil society
opposition
elite
welfare organization
dictatorship
social welfare
regime
leadership

Keywords

  • Social Revolution
  • Civil Society

Cite this

@article{725df52a0b7942a2923880dd5bf60e70,
title = "Long-term effects: Social revolution and civil society in Portugal, 1974-2010",
abstract = "Do democratic social revolutions strengthen civil society in the long-run? We answer this question by comparing the trajectories of three civil society sectors (social welfare organizations, neighborhood associations, and unions) in democratic Portugal. We argue that the degree of inclusiveness of the institutions of the previous authoritarian regime shaped the type of revolutionary elites available for alliances with civil society during the revolutionary crisis. More inclusionary authoritarian institutions promoted the emergence of a more pluralistic opposition to the dictatorship, thus generating future revolutionary leaderships prone to empowering emerging popular civil society organizations. Inversely, exclusionary and repressive institutions spawned a narrow and secretive opposition and subsequent revolutionary elite bent on hierarchical topdown control thereby disempowering civil society in the long-run.",
keywords = "Social Revolution, Civil Society",
author = "Tiago Fernandes and Rui Branco",
note = "info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147295/PT#",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "411--431",
journal = "Comparative european politics",
issn = "1472-4790",
publisher = "PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD",
number = "3",

}

Long-term effects : Social revolution and civil society in Portugal, 1974-2010. / Fernandes, Tiago; Branco, Rui.

In: Comparative Politics, Vol. 49, No. 3, 01.04.2017, p. 411-431.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term effects

T2 - Social revolution and civil society in Portugal, 1974-2010

AU - Fernandes, Tiago

AU - Branco, Rui

N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147295/PT#

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Do democratic social revolutions strengthen civil society in the long-run? We answer this question by comparing the trajectories of three civil society sectors (social welfare organizations, neighborhood associations, and unions) in democratic Portugal. We argue that the degree of inclusiveness of the institutions of the previous authoritarian regime shaped the type of revolutionary elites available for alliances with civil society during the revolutionary crisis. More inclusionary authoritarian institutions promoted the emergence of a more pluralistic opposition to the dictatorship, thus generating future revolutionary leaderships prone to empowering emerging popular civil society organizations. Inversely, exclusionary and repressive institutions spawned a narrow and secretive opposition and subsequent revolutionary elite bent on hierarchical topdown control thereby disempowering civil society in the long-run.

AB - Do democratic social revolutions strengthen civil society in the long-run? We answer this question by comparing the trajectories of three civil society sectors (social welfare organizations, neighborhood associations, and unions) in democratic Portugal. We argue that the degree of inclusiveness of the institutions of the previous authoritarian regime shaped the type of revolutionary elites available for alliances with civil society during the revolutionary crisis. More inclusionary authoritarian institutions promoted the emergence of a more pluralistic opposition to the dictatorship, thus generating future revolutionary leaderships prone to empowering emerging popular civil society organizations. Inversely, exclusionary and repressive institutions spawned a narrow and secretive opposition and subsequent revolutionary elite bent on hierarchical topdown control thereby disempowering civil society in the long-run.

KW - Social Revolution

KW - Civil Society

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029513892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://apps.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?customersID=RRC&mode=FullRecord&IsProductCode=Yes&product=WOS&Init=Yes&Func=Frame&DestFail=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webofknowledge.com&action=retrieve&SrcApp=RRC&SrcAuth=RRC&SID=E1HGnH6D2z9RaaSkBaR&UT=WOS%3A000398243700007

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 411

EP - 431

JO - Comparative european politics

JF - Comparative european politics

SN - 1472-4790

IS - 3

ER -