Aprender del riesgo

Lecciones de L’Aquila y Japón

Translated title of the contribution: Learning from risk: Lessons from L’Aquila and Japan

Lia Vasconcelos, Iva Pires, Isabel Abreu-Santos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Contemporary society faces complex, uncertain and global risks. The extensive scientific literature is not consensual about the concept of risk or the relevance of its perception by the populations, their level of preparedness or the ways they deal with risk and disaster situations. Assuming that better prepared societies face risk situations more efficiently, two case studies were submitted to research and comparison — L’Aquila earthquake and Japan’s triple disaster (earthquake, tsunami and nuclear). Results point to a general inability to manage risk in unforeseen situations. Risk communication has shown to be inadequate, with major flaws, transmitting a false sense of safety. The governance model exposed the failure of the decision structures in dealing with the events, thus contributing to the creation of distrust and insecurity in the communities smitten by calamity. Past experiences have created adequate behaviours in L’Aquila, but gave rise to false assumptions in Japan, jeopardizing human lives. This paper intends to reflect and draw lessons learned in these experiences, which may serve as a baseline and as support for future guidelines.

Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)107-147
Number of pages41
JournalPsyecology
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Japan
learning
Learning
Earthquakes
Disasters
disaster
Structure Collapse
earthquake
Tsunamis
Literature
tsunami
safety
Communication
Guidelines
Safety
Research
Population
society

Keywords

  • Japan’s triple disaster
  • L’Aquila earthquake
  • Risk communication
  • Risk governance

Cite this

Vasconcelos, Lia ; Pires, Iva ; Abreu-Santos, Isabel. / Aprender del riesgo : Lecciones de L’Aquila y Japón. In: Psyecology. 2017 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 107-147.
@article{a5ffa0493fed406289d59f65da90bbf6,
title = "Aprender del riesgo: Lecciones de L’Aquila y Jap{\'o}n",
abstract = "Contemporary society faces complex, uncertain and global risks. The extensive scientific literature is not consensual about the concept of risk or the relevance of its perception by the populations, their level of preparedness or the ways they deal with risk and disaster situations. Assuming that better prepared societies face risk situations more efficiently, two case studies were submitted to research and comparison — L’Aquila earthquake and Japan’s triple disaster (earthquake, tsunami and nuclear). Results point to a general inability to manage risk in unforeseen situations. Risk communication has shown to be inadequate, with major flaws, transmitting a false sense of safety. The governance model exposed the failure of the decision structures in dealing with the events, thus contributing to the creation of distrust and insecurity in the communities smitten by calamity. Past experiences have created adequate behaviours in L’Aquila, but gave rise to false assumptions in Japan, jeopardizing human lives. This paper intends to reflect and draw lessons learned in these experiences, which may serve as a baseline and as support for future guidelines.",
keywords = "Japan’s triple disaster, L’Aquila earthquake, Risk communication, Risk governance",
author = "Lia Vasconcelos and Iva Pires and Isabel Abreu-Santos",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/21711976.2016.1267854",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "8",
pages = "107--147",
journal = "Psyecology - Revista Biling{\"u}e de Psicolog{\'i}a Ambiental",
issn = "2171-1976",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Aprender del riesgo : Lecciones de L’Aquila y Japón. / Vasconcelos, Lia; Pires, Iva; Abreu-Santos, Isabel.

In: Psyecology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 107-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aprender del riesgo

T2 - Lecciones de L’Aquila y Japón

AU - Vasconcelos, Lia

AU - Pires, Iva

AU - Abreu-Santos, Isabel

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Contemporary society faces complex, uncertain and global risks. The extensive scientific literature is not consensual about the concept of risk or the relevance of its perception by the populations, their level of preparedness or the ways they deal with risk and disaster situations. Assuming that better prepared societies face risk situations more efficiently, two case studies were submitted to research and comparison — L’Aquila earthquake and Japan’s triple disaster (earthquake, tsunami and nuclear). Results point to a general inability to manage risk in unforeseen situations. Risk communication has shown to be inadequate, with major flaws, transmitting a false sense of safety. The governance model exposed the failure of the decision structures in dealing with the events, thus contributing to the creation of distrust and insecurity in the communities smitten by calamity. Past experiences have created adequate behaviours in L’Aquila, but gave rise to false assumptions in Japan, jeopardizing human lives. This paper intends to reflect and draw lessons learned in these experiences, which may serve as a baseline and as support for future guidelines.

AB - Contemporary society faces complex, uncertain and global risks. The extensive scientific literature is not consensual about the concept of risk or the relevance of its perception by the populations, their level of preparedness or the ways they deal with risk and disaster situations. Assuming that better prepared societies face risk situations more efficiently, two case studies were submitted to research and comparison — L’Aquila earthquake and Japan’s triple disaster (earthquake, tsunami and nuclear). Results point to a general inability to manage risk in unforeseen situations. Risk communication has shown to be inadequate, with major flaws, transmitting a false sense of safety. The governance model exposed the failure of the decision structures in dealing with the events, thus contributing to the creation of distrust and insecurity in the communities smitten by calamity. Past experiences have created adequate behaviours in L’Aquila, but gave rise to false assumptions in Japan, jeopardizing human lives. This paper intends to reflect and draw lessons learned in these experiences, which may serve as a baseline and as support for future guidelines.

KW - Japan’s triple disaster

KW - L’Aquila earthquake

KW - Risk communication

KW - Risk governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054824379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21711976.2016.1267854

DO - 10.1080/21711976.2016.1267854

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 107

EP - 147

JO - Psyecology - Revista Bilingüe de Psicología Ambiental

JF - Psyecology - Revista Bilingüe de Psicología Ambiental

SN - 2171-1976

IS - 1

ER -