Abstract
We study the decidability of k-provability in PA —the relation ‘being provable in PA with at most k steps’—and the decidability of the proof-skeleton problem—the problem of deciding if a given formula has a proof that has a given skeleton (the list of axioms and rules that were used). The decidability of k-provability for the usual Hilbert-style formalisation of PA is still an open problem, but it is known that the proof-skeleton problem is undecidable for that theory. Using new methods, we present a characterisation of some numbers k for which k-provability is decidable, and we present a characterisation of some proof-skeletons for which one can decide whether a formula has a proof whose skeleton is the considered one. These characterisations are natural and parameterised by unification algorithms.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 477-516 |
Journal | Logica Universalis |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2021 |
Keywords
- Decidability
- k-provability
- Peano arithmetic
- Proof-skeleton problem