Interdisciplinary stratified care for low back pain

A qualitative study on the acceptability, potential facilitators and barriers to implementation

Carmen Caeiro, Helena Canhão, Sofia Paiva, Luís A. Gomes, Rita Fernandes, Ana Maria Rodrigues, Rute Sousa, Fernando Pimentel-Santos, Jaime Branco, Ana Cristina Fryxell, Lília Vicente, Eduardo B. Cruz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The SPLIT project aims to introduce an interdisciplinary stratified model of care for patients with low back pain. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and identify potential barriers and facilitators regarding the upcoming implementation of this project, based on the general practitioners' and physiotherapists' perceptions. METHODS: A qualitative study was carried out supported by two focus groups, which were conducted by two researchers. A focus group was carried out with each professional group. One focus group included six general practitioners and the other included six physiotherapists. The focus groups were based on a semi-structured interview schedule, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The participants explored aspects related to the acceptability of the SPLIT project, emphasising the satisfactory amount of effort that is expected to be required for its implementation. Potential facilitators to the implementation of the model were identified, such as the participants`motivation. Potential barriers were also explored, with particular emphasis on the challenges related to the change of routine care. Lastly, the need for particular adjustments in the health services was also highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: This study`s participants highlighted the feasibility and acceptability of the SPLIT project. The identification of potential barriers and facilitators to its implementation also attained major relevance to better prepare the upcoming implementation of this project. The generalizability of findings to the larger population of relevant practitioners is limited, since only two focus groups were carried out. Therefore, this study`s findings should be considered in terms of transferability to contexts that may have some similarities to the context where the study was carried out.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e0225336
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

focus groups
back (body region)
Low Back Pain
Focus Groups
pain
general practitioners
Physical Therapists
General Practitioners
Health
patient care
health services
Health Services
interviews
Patient Care
Appointments and Schedules
researchers
Research Personnel
Interviews
Population

Cite this

Caeiro, Carmen ; Canhão, Helena ; Paiva, Sofia ; Gomes, Luís A. ; Fernandes, Rita ; Rodrigues, Ana Maria ; Sousa, Rute ; Pimentel-Santos, Fernando ; Branco, Jaime ; Fryxell, Ana Cristina ; Vicente, Lília ; Cruz, Eduardo B. / Interdisciplinary stratified care for low back pain : A qualitative study on the acceptability, potential facilitators and barriers to implementation. In: PLoS ONE. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 11. pp. e0225336.
@article{6949805e1d76494e9e300e84e930ecde,
title = "Interdisciplinary stratified care for low back pain: A qualitative study on the acceptability, potential facilitators and barriers to implementation",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The SPLIT project aims to introduce an interdisciplinary stratified model of care for patients with low back pain. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and identify potential barriers and facilitators regarding the upcoming implementation of this project, based on the general practitioners' and physiotherapists' perceptions. METHODS: A qualitative study was carried out supported by two focus groups, which were conducted by two researchers. A focus group was carried out with each professional group. One focus group included six general practitioners and the other included six physiotherapists. The focus groups were based on a semi-structured interview schedule, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The participants explored aspects related to the acceptability of the SPLIT project, emphasising the satisfactory amount of effort that is expected to be required for its implementation. Potential facilitators to the implementation of the model were identified, such as the participants`motivation. Potential barriers were also explored, with particular emphasis on the challenges related to the change of routine care. Lastly, the need for particular adjustments in the health services was also highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: This study`s participants highlighted the feasibility and acceptability of the SPLIT project. The identification of potential barriers and facilitators to its implementation also attained major relevance to better prepare the upcoming implementation of this project. The generalizability of findings to the larger population of relevant practitioners is limited, since only two focus groups were carried out. Therefore, this study`s findings should be considered in terms of transferability to contexts that may have some similarities to the context where the study was carried out.",
author = "Carmen Caeiro and Helena Canh{\~a}o and Sofia Paiva and Gomes, {Lu{\'i}s A.} and Rita Fernandes and Rodrigues, {Ana Maria} and Rute Sousa and Fernando Pimentel-Santos and Jaime Branco and Fryxell, {Ana Cristina} and L{\'i}lia Vicente and Cruz, {Eduardo B.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0225336",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "e0225336",
journal = "PlosOne",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "11",

}

Interdisciplinary stratified care for low back pain : A qualitative study on the acceptability, potential facilitators and barriers to implementation. / Caeiro, Carmen; Canhão, Helena; Paiva, Sofia; Gomes, Luís A.; Fernandes, Rita; Rodrigues, Ana Maria; Sousa, Rute; Pimentel-Santos, Fernando; Branco, Jaime; Fryxell, Ana Cristina; Vicente, Lília; Cruz, Eduardo B.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 11, 2019, p. e0225336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interdisciplinary stratified care for low back pain

T2 - A qualitative study on the acceptability, potential facilitators and barriers to implementation

AU - Caeiro, Carmen

AU - Canhão, Helena

AU - Paiva, Sofia

AU - Gomes, Luís A.

AU - Fernandes, Rita

AU - Rodrigues, Ana Maria

AU - Sousa, Rute

AU - Pimentel-Santos, Fernando

AU - Branco, Jaime

AU - Fryxell, Ana Cristina

AU - Vicente, Lília

AU - Cruz, Eduardo B.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The SPLIT project aims to introduce an interdisciplinary stratified model of care for patients with low back pain. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and identify potential barriers and facilitators regarding the upcoming implementation of this project, based on the general practitioners' and physiotherapists' perceptions. METHODS: A qualitative study was carried out supported by two focus groups, which were conducted by two researchers. A focus group was carried out with each professional group. One focus group included six general practitioners and the other included six physiotherapists. The focus groups were based on a semi-structured interview schedule, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The participants explored aspects related to the acceptability of the SPLIT project, emphasising the satisfactory amount of effort that is expected to be required for its implementation. Potential facilitators to the implementation of the model were identified, such as the participants`motivation. Potential barriers were also explored, with particular emphasis on the challenges related to the change of routine care. Lastly, the need for particular adjustments in the health services was also highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: This study`s participants highlighted the feasibility and acceptability of the SPLIT project. The identification of potential barriers and facilitators to its implementation also attained major relevance to better prepare the upcoming implementation of this project. The generalizability of findings to the larger population of relevant practitioners is limited, since only two focus groups were carried out. Therefore, this study`s findings should be considered in terms of transferability to contexts that may have some similarities to the context where the study was carried out.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The SPLIT project aims to introduce an interdisciplinary stratified model of care for patients with low back pain. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and identify potential barriers and facilitators regarding the upcoming implementation of this project, based on the general practitioners' and physiotherapists' perceptions. METHODS: A qualitative study was carried out supported by two focus groups, which were conducted by two researchers. A focus group was carried out with each professional group. One focus group included six general practitioners and the other included six physiotherapists. The focus groups were based on a semi-structured interview schedule, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The participants explored aspects related to the acceptability of the SPLIT project, emphasising the satisfactory amount of effort that is expected to be required for its implementation. Potential facilitators to the implementation of the model were identified, such as the participants`motivation. Potential barriers were also explored, with particular emphasis on the challenges related to the change of routine care. Lastly, the need for particular adjustments in the health services was also highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: This study`s participants highlighted the feasibility and acceptability of the SPLIT project. The identification of potential barriers and facilitators to its implementation also attained major relevance to better prepare the upcoming implementation of this project. The generalizability of findings to the larger population of relevant practitioners is limited, since only two focus groups were carried out. Therefore, this study`s findings should be considered in terms of transferability to contexts that may have some similarities to the context where the study was carried out.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075113916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0225336

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0225336

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - e0225336

JO - PlosOne

JF - PlosOne

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 11

ER -