TY - JOUR
T1 - Incorporating economics into fishery policies
T2 - Developing integrated ecological-economics harvest control rules
AU - Rosa, Renato
AU - Costa, Tiago
AU - Mota, Rui Pedro
N1 - Funding Information:
Renato Rosa acknowledges funding from FCT under the Scientific Employment Stimulus ( CEECIND/02230/2017 ) and the The FCT Investigator Programme ( IF/01106/2012/CP0153/CT0003 ).
Funding Information:
CENSE is financed by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia , I.P., Portugal ( UIDB/04085/2020 ).
Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from Funda??o Calouste Gulbenkian. This research work was developed in the context of the project entitled ?The Economic Valuation and Governance of Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services (MCES)?. This work was funded by Funda??o para a Ci?ncia e a Tecnologia (UID/ECO/00124/2019, UIDB/00124/2020 and Social Sciences DataLab, PINFRA/22209/2016), POR Lisboa and POR Norte (Social Sciences DataLab, PINFRA/22209/2016). CENSE is financed by Funda??o para a Ci?ncia e Tecnologia, I.P. Portugal (UIDB/04085/2020). Renato Rosa acknowledges funding from FCT under the Scientific Employment Stimulus (CEECIND/02230/2017) and the The FCT Investigator Programme (IF/01106/2012/CP0153/CT0003). Rui Mota acknowledges the financial support by FCT (SFRH/BPD/81880/2011).
Funding Information:
This work was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia ( UID/ECO/00124/2019 , UIDB/00124/2020 and Social Sciences DataLab , PINFRA/22209/2016 ), POR Lisboa and POR Norte (Social Sciences DataLab, PINFRA/22209/2016 ).
Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian . This research work was developed in the context of the project entitled “The Economic Valuation and Governance of Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services (MCES)”.
Funding Information:
Rui Mota acknowledges the financial support by FCT ( SFRH/BPD/81880/2011 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Despite the efforts of management authorities, several fish stocks continue to be harvested at unsustainable levels. While integrating economics into catch advice has been identified as key in developing more effective management, few studies investigate how bioeconomic modelling can inform decision-making. At the same time, increasing evidence has been gathered on the occurrence of regime shifts in marine ecosystems, raising greater concerns regarding fish stocks' recovery ability. Policy evaluation methods, however, still resort to compensation population models. As a result, these may overestimate reproductive success, thus jeopardizing the design and evaluation of stock rebuilding policies. This paper addresses those challenges proposing a methodology that approximates a harvest control rule using an age-structured bioeconomic model. As a result, we deliver a policy rule that complies with current advice procedures and endogenously captures economics. Also, we consider concerns on the existence of regime shifts in marine populations and estimate a bioeconomic model with critical depensation. Results from our case study suggest that policies neglecting the existence of critical depensation may compromise stock rebuilding objectives and might even result in fishery collapses. Using bioeconomic modelling to define harvest control rules may enhance policy design aimed at reconciling fisheries' economic returns and stock recovery.
AB - Despite the efforts of management authorities, several fish stocks continue to be harvested at unsustainable levels. While integrating economics into catch advice has been identified as key in developing more effective management, few studies investigate how bioeconomic modelling can inform decision-making. At the same time, increasing evidence has been gathered on the occurrence of regime shifts in marine ecosystems, raising greater concerns regarding fish stocks' recovery ability. Policy evaluation methods, however, still resort to compensation population models. As a result, these may overestimate reproductive success, thus jeopardizing the design and evaluation of stock rebuilding policies. This paper addresses those challenges proposing a methodology that approximates a harvest control rule using an age-structured bioeconomic model. As a result, we deliver a policy rule that complies with current advice procedures and endogenously captures economics. Also, we consider concerns on the existence of regime shifts in marine populations and estimate a bioeconomic model with critical depensation. Results from our case study suggest that policies neglecting the existence of critical depensation may compromise stock rebuilding objectives and might even result in fishery collapses. Using bioeconomic modelling to define harvest control rules may enhance policy design aimed at reconciling fisheries' economic returns and stock recovery.
KW - Allee effects
KW - Bioeconomic models
KW - Critical depensation
KW - Fishery policy
KW - Harvest control rules
KW - Regime shifts
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127095741&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107418
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107418
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85127095741
SN - 0921-8009
VL - 196
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
M1 - 107418
ER -