Inabilities, excuses and exemptions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this paper I will argue, following Moody-Adams’s (1994) paper “Culture, responsibility and affected ignorance,” that inability does not excuse in general, but against Moody-Adams I will argue that this is not because of “affected ignorance” but simply because of responsibilities individual agents have by virtue of belonging to and participating in the collective actions of a certain kind of collective. Excusability has been misdiagnosed as depending on whether the ignorance of wrongdoing involved is culpable or non-culpable.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-127
Number of pages24
Journalethic@
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • The inability thesis, reactive attitudes, collective responsibility, collective intentionality

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Inabilities, excuses and exemptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this