TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of a care pathway for COPD on adherence to guidelines and hospital readmission
T2 - a cluster randomized trial
AU - Vanhaecht, Kris
AU - Lodewijckx, Cathy
AU - Sermeus, Walter
AU - Decramer, Marc
AU - Deneckere, Svin
AU - Leigheb, Fabrizio
AU - Boto, Paulo
AU - Kul, Seval
AU - Seys, Deborah
AU - Panella, Massimiliano
PY - 2016/11/23
Y1 - 2016/11/23
N2 - Purpose: Current in-hospital management of exacerbations of COPD is suboptimal, and patient outcomes are poor. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether implementation of a care pathway (CP) for COPD improves the 6 months readmission rate. Secondary outcomes were the 30 days readmission rate, mortality, length of stay and adherence to guidelines. Patients and methods: An international cluster randomized controlled trial was performed in Belgium, Italy and Portugal. General hospitals were randomly assigned to an intervention group where a CP was implemented or a control group where usual care was provided. The targeted population included patients with COPD exacerbation. Results: Twenty-two hospitals were included, whereof 11 hospitals (n=174 patients) were randomized to the intervention group and 11 hospitals (n=168 patients) to the control group. The CP had no impact on the 6 months readmission rate. However, the 30 days readmission rate was significantly lower in the intervention group (9.7%; 15/155) compared to the control group (15.3%; 22/144) (odds ratio =0.427; 95% confidence interval 0.222-0.822; P=0.040). Performance on process indicators was significantly higher in the intervention group for 2 of 24 main indicators (8.3%). Conclusion: The implementation of this in-hospital CP for COPD exacerbation has no impact on the 6 months readmission rate, but it significantly reduces the 30 days readmission rate.
AB - Purpose: Current in-hospital management of exacerbations of COPD is suboptimal, and patient outcomes are poor. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether implementation of a care pathway (CP) for COPD improves the 6 months readmission rate. Secondary outcomes were the 30 days readmission rate, mortality, length of stay and adherence to guidelines. Patients and methods: An international cluster randomized controlled trial was performed in Belgium, Italy and Portugal. General hospitals were randomly assigned to an intervention group where a CP was implemented or a control group where usual care was provided. The targeted population included patients with COPD exacerbation. Results: Twenty-two hospitals were included, whereof 11 hospitals (n=174 patients) were randomized to the intervention group and 11 hospitals (n=168 patients) to the control group. The CP had no impact on the 6 months readmission rate. However, the 30 days readmission rate was significantly lower in the intervention group (9.7%; 15/155) compared to the control group (15.3%; 22/144) (odds ratio =0.427; 95% confidence interval 0.222-0.822; P=0.040). Performance on process indicators was significantly higher in the intervention group for 2 of 24 main indicators (8.3%). Conclusion: The implementation of this in-hospital CP for COPD exacerbation has no impact on the 6 months readmission rate, but it significantly reduces the 30 days readmission rate.
KW - Care pathway
KW - Cluster randomized controlled trial
KW - COPD
KW - Quality improvement
KW - Readmission
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85000538800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2147/COPD.S119849
DO - 10.2147/COPD.S119849
M3 - Article
C2 - 27920516
AN - SCOPUS:85000538800
SN - 1176-9106
VL - 11
SP - 2897
EP - 2908
JO - International Journal of COPD
JF - International Journal of COPD
IS - 1
ER -