TY - JOUR
T1 - If I told you that there is no need for yellow fever vaccine booster would you still come to the travel clinic?
T2 - a cross-sectional study
AU - Alves, Iolanda
AU - Teodósio, Rosa
AU - Pereira, Filomena
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/3/12
Y1 - 2021/3/12
N2 - Background: Yellow Fever (YF) immunization required a single dose vaccine with boosters every 10 years. After International Health Regulation (IHR) amendment annex 7 (July 2016), it was accepted that a single dose confers lifelong immunity. Since pre-travel advice is as important as vaccination when traveling, it is essential to clarify why travelers come to a travel health consultation, with the possibility of IHR amendment having a negative impact on travelers’ health. This study aims to describe travelers’ reasons to come to a pre-travel consultation in Lisbon and if they would return if they wouldn’t need the YF vaccine booster. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted during 5 months in the waiting room of Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical travel clinic in Lisbon, Portugal. Travelers were asked about sociodemographic characteristics, destination country, travel duration and reasons to travel in an anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Results: A total of 1043 travelers agreed to participate in the study. Although 61.0% (627/1028) did not come to the clinic to get the YF vaccine, from those who did, 36.7% (133/362) would not come and 12.9% (47/362) didn’t knew if they would come if the vaccine would not be necessary. Conclusion: The IHR amendment may have a negative impact on travel clinic attendance and on travelers´ health.
AB - Background: Yellow Fever (YF) immunization required a single dose vaccine with boosters every 10 years. After International Health Regulation (IHR) amendment annex 7 (July 2016), it was accepted that a single dose confers lifelong immunity. Since pre-travel advice is as important as vaccination when traveling, it is essential to clarify why travelers come to a travel health consultation, with the possibility of IHR amendment having a negative impact on travelers’ health. This study aims to describe travelers’ reasons to come to a pre-travel consultation in Lisbon and if they would return if they wouldn’t need the YF vaccine booster. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted during 5 months in the waiting room of Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical travel clinic in Lisbon, Portugal. Travelers were asked about sociodemographic characteristics, destination country, travel duration and reasons to travel in an anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Results: A total of 1043 travelers agreed to participate in the study. Although 61.0% (627/1028) did not come to the clinic to get the YF vaccine, from those who did, 36.7% (133/362) would not come and 12.9% (47/362) didn’t knew if they would come if the vaccine would not be necessary. Conclusion: The IHR amendment may have a negative impact on travel clinic attendance and on travelers´ health.
KW - International health regulation amendment
KW - Prevention
KW - Travel health consultation
KW - Travelers
KW - Yellow fever vaccine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102501557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40794-021-00132-8
DO - 10.1186/s40794-021-00132-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 33712073
AN - SCOPUS:85102501557
SN - 2055-0936
VL - 7
SP - 1
EP - 5
JO - Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines
JF - Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines
IS - 1
M1 - 7
ER -