How to overcome the implementation gap in ecosystem services? A user-friendly and inclusive tool for improved urban management

Harold Levrel, Pedro Cabral, Clément Feger, Mélodie Chambolle, Damien Basque

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the main issues with the concept of ecosystem services is its absence on the ground in concrete operational decision-making contexts; that is, an implementation gap. In this study, we investigated if this gap could be overcome through the use of open-source data and free tools, and the adoption of a short-term participatory process. We tested these methods in the context of a project in the urban metropolitan area of Bordeaux (Communauté urbaine de Bordeaux: CUB) in France. The ecosystem services were defined using a participatory approach involving local stakeholders, and then selected scenarios were simulated to test the impact of various development or conservation plans. The study addressed three main questions: (1) Is it possible to adopt a simple methodological approach that overcomes the implementation gap through the development of a user-friendly and inclusive method? (2) What is the added value of a participatory approach? (3) With regards to four scenarios in this territory, what are the ES trends in the selected biophysical and monetary indicators, and will knowledge of these trends help planners to shape a sustainable trajectory for the territory?

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)574-584
Number of pages11
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume68
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

participatory approach
ecosystem service
ecosystem services
scenario
value added
trend
management
urban areas
stakeholders
metropolitan area
trajectories
decision making
agglomeration area
stakeholder
conservation
France
trajectory
methodology
testing
method

Keywords

  • Ecosystem services
  • Geographical information systems
  • Implementation gap
  • Land use and cover change
  • Natural Capital Project
  • Open data
  • Spatial planning
  • Urban ecosystem

Cite this

Levrel, Harold ; Cabral, Pedro ; Feger, Clément ; Chambolle, Mélodie ; Basque, Damien. / How to overcome the implementation gap in ecosystem services? A user-friendly and inclusive tool for improved urban management. In: Land Use Policy. 2017 ; Vol. 68. pp. 574-584.
@article{5d3e4bcad7794155b45b5ea94dafd6a6,
title = "How to overcome the implementation gap in ecosystem services? A user-friendly and inclusive tool for improved urban management",
abstract = "One of the main issues with the concept of ecosystem services is its absence on the ground in concrete operational decision-making contexts; that is, an implementation gap. In this study, we investigated if this gap could be overcome through the use of open-source data and free tools, and the adoption of a short-term participatory process. We tested these methods in the context of a project in the urban metropolitan area of Bordeaux (Communaut{\'e} urbaine de Bordeaux: CUB) in France. The ecosystem services were defined using a participatory approach involving local stakeholders, and then selected scenarios were simulated to test the impact of various development or conservation plans. The study addressed three main questions: (1) Is it possible to adopt a simple methodological approach that overcomes the implementation gap through the development of a user-friendly and inclusive method? (2) What is the added value of a participatory approach? (3) With regards to four scenarios in this territory, what are the ES trends in the selected biophysical and monetary indicators, and will knowledge of these trends help planners to shape a sustainable trajectory for the territory?",
keywords = "Ecosystem services, Geographical information systems, Implementation gap, Land use and cover change, Natural Capital Project, Open data, Spatial planning, Urban ecosystem",
author = "Harold Levrel and Pedro Cabral and Cl{\'e}ment Feger and M{\'e}lodie Chambolle and Damien Basque",
note = "Levrel, H., Cabral, P., Feger, C., Chambolle, M., & Basque, D. (2017). How to overcome the implementation gap in ecosystem services? A user-friendly and inclusive tool for improved urban management. Land Use Policy, 68, 574-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.037",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.037",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "574--584",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.",

}

How to overcome the implementation gap in ecosystem services? A user-friendly and inclusive tool for improved urban management. / Levrel, Harold; Cabral, Pedro; Feger, Clément; Chambolle, Mélodie; Basque, Damien.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 68, 01.11.2017, p. 574-584.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to overcome the implementation gap in ecosystem services? A user-friendly and inclusive tool for improved urban management

AU - Levrel, Harold

AU - Cabral, Pedro

AU - Feger, Clément

AU - Chambolle, Mélodie

AU - Basque, Damien

N1 - Levrel, H., Cabral, P., Feger, C., Chambolle, M., & Basque, D. (2017). How to overcome the implementation gap in ecosystem services? A user-friendly and inclusive tool for improved urban management. Land Use Policy, 68, 574-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.037

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - One of the main issues with the concept of ecosystem services is its absence on the ground in concrete operational decision-making contexts; that is, an implementation gap. In this study, we investigated if this gap could be overcome through the use of open-source data and free tools, and the adoption of a short-term participatory process. We tested these methods in the context of a project in the urban metropolitan area of Bordeaux (Communauté urbaine de Bordeaux: CUB) in France. The ecosystem services were defined using a participatory approach involving local stakeholders, and then selected scenarios were simulated to test the impact of various development or conservation plans. The study addressed three main questions: (1) Is it possible to adopt a simple methodological approach that overcomes the implementation gap through the development of a user-friendly and inclusive method? (2) What is the added value of a participatory approach? (3) With regards to four scenarios in this territory, what are the ES trends in the selected biophysical and monetary indicators, and will knowledge of these trends help planners to shape a sustainable trajectory for the territory?

AB - One of the main issues with the concept of ecosystem services is its absence on the ground in concrete operational decision-making contexts; that is, an implementation gap. In this study, we investigated if this gap could be overcome through the use of open-source data and free tools, and the adoption of a short-term participatory process. We tested these methods in the context of a project in the urban metropolitan area of Bordeaux (Communauté urbaine de Bordeaux: CUB) in France. The ecosystem services were defined using a participatory approach involving local stakeholders, and then selected scenarios were simulated to test the impact of various development or conservation plans. The study addressed three main questions: (1) Is it possible to adopt a simple methodological approach that overcomes the implementation gap through the development of a user-friendly and inclusive method? (2) What is the added value of a participatory approach? (3) With regards to four scenarios in this territory, what are the ES trends in the selected biophysical and monetary indicators, and will knowledge of these trends help planners to shape a sustainable trajectory for the territory?

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Geographical information systems

KW - Implementation gap

KW - Land use and cover change

KW - Natural Capital Project

KW - Open data

KW - Spatial planning

KW - Urban ecosystem

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028514546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.037

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.037

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 574

EP - 584

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -