TY - JOUR
T1 - How power affects people
T2 - Activating, wanting, and goal seeking
AU - Guinote, Ana
PY - 2017/1/3
Y1 - 2017/1/3
N2 - Sociocognitive research has demonstrated that power affects how people feel, think, and act. In this article, I review literature from social psychology, neuroscience, management, and animal research and propose an integrated framework of power as an intensifier of goal-related approach motivation. A growing literature shows that power energizes thought, speech, and action and orients individuals toward salient goals linked to power roles, predispositions, tasks, and opportunities. Power magnifies self-expression linked to active parts of the self (the active self), enhancing confidence, self-regulation, and prioritization of efforts toward advancing focal goals. The effects of power on cognitive processes, goal preferences, performance, and corruption are discussed, and its potentially detrimental effects on social attention, perspective taking, and objectification of subordinates are examined. Several inconsistencies in the literature are explained by viewing power holders as more flexible and dynamic than is usually assumed.
AB - Sociocognitive research has demonstrated that power affects how people feel, think, and act. In this article, I review literature from social psychology, neuroscience, management, and animal research and propose an integrated framework of power as an intensifier of goal-related approach motivation. A growing literature shows that power energizes thought, speech, and action and orients individuals toward salient goals linked to power roles, predispositions, tasks, and opportunities. Power magnifies self-expression linked to active parts of the self (the active self), enhancing confidence, self-regulation, and prioritization of efforts toward advancing focal goals. The effects of power on cognitive processes, goal preferences, performance, and corruption are discussed, and its potentially detrimental effects on social attention, perspective taking, and objectification of subordinates are examined. Several inconsistencies in the literature are explained by viewing power holders as more flexible and dynamic than is usually assumed.
KW - Approach motivation
KW - Corruption
KW - Dominance
KW - Goal seeking
KW - Self-regulation
KW - Social power
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009473767&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044153
DO - 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044153
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85009473767
SN - 0066-4308
VL - 68
SP - 353
EP - 381
JO - Annual Review of Psychology
JF - Annual Review of Psychology
ER -