How early adolescent skills and preferences shape economics education choices

Lenka Fiala, John Eric Humphries, Juanna Schrøter Joensen, Uditi Karna, John A. List, Gregory F. Veramendi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Leveraging data from Sweden and Chicago, we study the educational pipeline for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and economics majors to better understand the determinants of the gender gap and when these determinants arise. We present three findings. First, females are less likely to select STEM courses in high school despite equal or better preparation. Second, there are important gender differences in preferences and beliefs, even conditional on ability. Third, early differences in preferences and beliefs explain more of the gaps in high school sorting than other candidate variables. High school sorting then explains a large portion of the gender difference in college majors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)609-613
JournalAEA Papers and Proceedings
Volume112
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How early adolescent skills and preferences shape economics education choices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this