How Conditional Amnesties Can Assist Transitional Societies in Delivering on the Right to the Truth

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores how conditional amnesties can assist post-conflict societies to recover truth. It examines how such amnesties can be used optimally to achieve the best results as part of transitional justice mechanisms. Thus, a central question is to see how amnesties can be used for truth recovery purposes. For that reason, the status and role of amnesties, and whether such amnesties can be used to learn more about the past and assist in truth recovery is explored. The article explores what amnesties are, how prevalent they are and how amnesties can be used optimally to achieve the best results. An issue that is also explored is whether amnesties are needed for perpetrators to participate in transitional justice mechanisms. The argument that is made, in this regard, is that amnesty is absolutely necessary to persuade perpetrators to testify. If they do not have such legal protection, perpetrators fear the legal consequences that may result if they admit to crimes for which they have not been charged. Another question that is examined concerns whether amnesties, and specifically conditional amnesties, pass international law muster. This article therefore investigates the continual and extensive use of amnesty to determine whether a conditional amnesty violates international law. The article suggests how a conditional amnesty process could be structured and what difficulties such a process should avoid if perpetrators are to enter such a process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-175
Number of pages33
JournalInternational Human Rights Law Review
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

transitional society
amnesty
Amnesty International
international law
justice
legal protection

Keywords

  • amnesty
  • conditional amnesty
  • international law
  • perpetrators
  • the Right to the Truth
  • transitional justice

Cite this

@article{305d1622fa6b4c808d2c171ee030aa86,
title = "How Conditional Amnesties Can Assist Transitional Societies in Delivering on the Right to the Truth",
abstract = "This article explores how conditional amnesties can assist post-conflict societies to recover truth. It examines how such amnesties can be used optimally to achieve the best results as part of transitional justice mechanisms. Thus, a central question is to see how amnesties can be used for truth recovery purposes. For that reason, the status and role of amnesties, and whether such amnesties can be used to learn more about the past and assist in truth recovery is explored. The article explores what amnesties are, how prevalent they are and how amnesties can be used optimally to achieve the best results. An issue that is also explored is whether amnesties are needed for perpetrators to participate in transitional justice mechanisms. The argument that is made, in this regard, is that amnesty is absolutely necessary to persuade perpetrators to testify. If they do not have such legal protection, perpetrators fear the legal consequences that may result if they admit to crimes for which they have not been charged. Another question that is examined concerns whether amnesties, and specifically conditional amnesties, pass international law muster. This article therefore investigates the continual and extensive use of amnesty to determine whether a conditional amnesty violates international law. The article suggests how a conditional amnesty process could be structured and what difficulties such a process should avoid if perpetrators are to enter such a process.",
keywords = "amnesty, conditional amnesty, international law, perpetrators, the Right to the Truth, transitional justice",
author = "Sarkin, {Jeremy Julian}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1163/22131035-00602001",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "143--175",
journal = "International Human Rights Law Review",
issn = "2213-1027",
publisher = "Brill Academic Publishers",
number = "2",

}

How Conditional Amnesties Can Assist Transitional Societies in Delivering on the Right to the Truth. / Sarkin, Jeremy Julian.

In: International Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.01.2017, p. 143-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Conditional Amnesties Can Assist Transitional Societies in Delivering on the Right to the Truth

AU - Sarkin, Jeremy Julian

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This article explores how conditional amnesties can assist post-conflict societies to recover truth. It examines how such amnesties can be used optimally to achieve the best results as part of transitional justice mechanisms. Thus, a central question is to see how amnesties can be used for truth recovery purposes. For that reason, the status and role of amnesties, and whether such amnesties can be used to learn more about the past and assist in truth recovery is explored. The article explores what amnesties are, how prevalent they are and how amnesties can be used optimally to achieve the best results. An issue that is also explored is whether amnesties are needed for perpetrators to participate in transitional justice mechanisms. The argument that is made, in this regard, is that amnesty is absolutely necessary to persuade perpetrators to testify. If they do not have such legal protection, perpetrators fear the legal consequences that may result if they admit to crimes for which they have not been charged. Another question that is examined concerns whether amnesties, and specifically conditional amnesties, pass international law muster. This article therefore investigates the continual and extensive use of amnesty to determine whether a conditional amnesty violates international law. The article suggests how a conditional amnesty process could be structured and what difficulties such a process should avoid if perpetrators are to enter such a process.

AB - This article explores how conditional amnesties can assist post-conflict societies to recover truth. It examines how such amnesties can be used optimally to achieve the best results as part of transitional justice mechanisms. Thus, a central question is to see how amnesties can be used for truth recovery purposes. For that reason, the status and role of amnesties, and whether such amnesties can be used to learn more about the past and assist in truth recovery is explored. The article explores what amnesties are, how prevalent they are and how amnesties can be used optimally to achieve the best results. An issue that is also explored is whether amnesties are needed for perpetrators to participate in transitional justice mechanisms. The argument that is made, in this regard, is that amnesty is absolutely necessary to persuade perpetrators to testify. If they do not have such legal protection, perpetrators fear the legal consequences that may result if they admit to crimes for which they have not been charged. Another question that is examined concerns whether amnesties, and specifically conditional amnesties, pass international law muster. This article therefore investigates the continual and extensive use of amnesty to determine whether a conditional amnesty violates international law. The article suggests how a conditional amnesty process could be structured and what difficulties such a process should avoid if perpetrators are to enter such a process.

KW - amnesty

KW - conditional amnesty

KW - international law

KW - perpetrators

KW - the Right to the Truth

KW - transitional justice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038592400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/22131035-00602001

DO - 10.1163/22131035-00602001

M3 - Review article

VL - 6

SP - 143

EP - 175

JO - International Human Rights Law Review

JF - International Human Rights Law Review

SN - 2213-1027

IS - 2

ER -