Indicadores de qualidade para avaliar os cuidados clínicos prestados a doentes com infeção por VIH/SIDA: Relevância e utilidade avaliadas por profissionais de saúde

Translated title of the contribution: HIV/AIDS indicators for clinical care quality assessment: Relevance and utility assessed by health professionals

Emanuel Catumbela, Cristina Santos, Alberto Freitas, Carlos Costa, António Sarmento, Altamiro da Costa Pereira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: After conducting a systematic review of quality indicators for assessing HIV/AIDS clinical care, we aimed to assess the clinical relevance and practice utility of those indicators from the point of view of HIV/AIDS physician experts. Material and Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional study, in which we selected, by convenience, physicians who work in an Infectious Disease Department of a central hospital to complete two questionnaires with a core set of indicators to establish the most relevant and useful indicators for assessment of the clinical HIV/AIDS care. A Likert scale was used to rank the indicators. Results: Eleven of thirteen physicians filled two questionnaires. From the initial list of 53 quality indicators, 21 were identified as the most relevant and useful in HIV/AIDS clinical care. The internal consistency for clinical relevance in each indicators domain was for clinical signs and symptoms (p = 0.971), for therapy (p = 0.900), for prognosis (p = 0.820) and diagnosis (p = 0.733) and for practice utility were diagnosis (p = 0.934), clinical signs (p = 0.964), laboratory examinations (p = 0.947), therapy (p = 0.583) and prognosis (p = 0.368). Discussion: In the process of assessing the clinical relevance and practice utility of HIV/AIDS quality care indicators, it was found that the majority of physicians agreed that diagnosis and clinical symptoms and signs indicators domains are the most important for assessing the quality of care for HIV/AIDS patients. Conclusion: This instrument should be considered as a diagnostic tool, allowing hospital administrators to identify if HIV/AIDS care is properly delivered or needs improvement.

Translated title of the contributionHIV/AIDS indicators for clinical care quality assessment: Relevance and utility assessed by health professionals
Original languagePortuguese
Pages (from-to)389-400
Number of pages12
JournalActa medica portuguesa
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

Keywords

  • Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
  • HIV infections
  • Patient care
  • Quality assurance, health care
  • Quality indicators, health care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'HIV/AIDS indicators for clinical care quality assessment: Relevance and utility assessed by health professionals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this