Abstract
In a range of Indo-European languages (Romance, Albanian, Iranian, Indo-Aryan), the same oblique case (‘dative’) is associated with indirect objects and with animate/definite direct objects, independently of the particular morphology employed to spell out the oblique (inflectional or pre/postpositional). We argue that there is a syntactic category dative coinciding with the morphological one and encompassing both goal dative and definiteness/animacy dative. We provide a characterization of goal dative as an elementary predicate introducing a part-whole (i.e. possession) relation, arguing that the definiteness/animacy dative is an instance of this elementary predicate. Evidence sometimes used against the unification proposed (e.g. passives, agreement) admits of, or requires, other explanations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 197-240 |
Number of pages | 44 |
Journal | Natural language & linguistic theory |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2016 |
Keywords
- Agreement
- Case
- Dative
- Differential object marking
- Indo-Iranian
- Oblique
- Romance