TY - JOUR
T1 - Global patterns of tree wood density
AU - Yang, Hui
AU - Wang, Siyuan
AU - Son, Rackhun
AU - Lee, Hoontaek
AU - Benson, Vitus
AU - Zhang, Weijie
AU - Zhang, Yahai
AU - Zhang, Yuzhen
AU - Kattge, Jens
AU - Boenisch, Gerhard
AU - Schepaschenko, Dmitry
AU - Karaszewski, Zbigniew
AU - Stereńczak, Krzysztof
AU - Moreno-Martínez, Álvaro
AU - Nabais, Cristina
AU - Birnbaum, Philippe
AU - Vieilledent, Ghislain
AU - Weber, Ulrich
AU - Carvalhais, Nuno
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge Thomas Ibanez for his invaluable assistance in collecting wood density measurements. H.Y. is supported by the Project Office BIOMASS (grant number 50EE1904) funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. R.S. was supported by ESM2025. D.S. was supported by the ESA IFBN (ESA Contract No. 4000114425/15/NL/FF/gp) and ESA FRM4BIOMASS (ESA Contract No. 4000142684/23/I-EF-bgh) projects. Á.M.-M. was supported by the European Research Council under the ERC-SyG-2019 USMILE project (grant agreement 855187). S.W. and W.Z. acknowledge support from the International Max Planck Research School for Biogeochemical Cycles (IMPRS-gBGC). N.C. acknowledges contribution by the GlobBiomass DUE Project (ESA Contract No. 4000113100/14/I-NB). The data from Poland used for analysis were collected under REMBIOFOR project entitled “Remote sensing-based assessment of woody biomass and carbon storage in forests”, which was financially supported by the National Centre for Research and Development (Poland), under the BIOSTRATEG programme (Agreement No. BIOSTRATEG1/267755/4/NCBR/2015). Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Funding Information:
We acknowledge Thomas Ibanez for his invaluable assistance in collecting wood density measurements. H.Y. is supported by the Project Office BIOMASS (grant number 50EE1904) funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. R.S. was supported by ESM2025. D.S. was supported by the ESA IFBN (ESA Contract No. 4000114425/15/NL/FF/gp) and ESA FRM4BIOMASS (ESA Contract No. 4000142684/23/I‐EF‐bgh) projects. Á.M.‐M. was supported by the European Research Council under the ERC‐SyG‐2019 USMILE project (grant agreement 855187). S.W. and W.Z. acknowledge support from the International Max Planck Research School for Biogeochemical Cycles (IMPRS‐gBGC). N.C. acknowledges contribution by the GlobBiomass DUE Project (ESA Contract No. 4000113100/14/I‐NB). The data from Poland used for analysis were collected under REMBIOFOR project entitled “Remote sensing‐based assessment of woody biomass and carbon storage in forests”, which was financially supported by the National Centre for Research and Development (Poland), under the BIOSTRATEG programme (Agreement No. BIOSTRATEG1/267755/4/NCBR/2015). Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Wood density is a fundamental property related to tree biomechanics and hydraulic function while playing a crucial role in assessing vegetation carbon stocks by linking volumetric retrieval and a mass estimate. This study provides a high-resolution map of the global distribution of tree wood density at the 0.01° (~1 km) spatial resolution, derived from four decision trees machine learning models using a global database of 28,822 tree-level wood density measurements. An ensemble of four top-performing models combined with eight cross-validation strategies shows great consistency, providing wood density patterns with pronounced spatial heterogeneity. The global pattern shows lower wood density values in northern and northwestern Europe, Canadian forest regions and slightly higher values in Siberia forests, western United States, and southern China. In contrast, tropical regions, especially wet tropical areas, exhibit high wood density. Climatic predictors explain 49%–63% of spatial variations, followed by vegetation characteristics (25%–31%) and edaphic properties (11%–16%). Notably, leaf type (evergreen vs. deciduous) and leaf habit type (broadleaved vs. needleleaved) are the most dominant individual features among all selected predictive covariates. Wood density tends to be higher for angiosperm broadleaf trees compared to gymnosperm needleleaf trees, particularly for evergreen species. The distributions of wood density categorized by leaf types and leaf habit types have good agreement with the features observed in wood density measurements. This global map quantifying wood density distribution can help improve accurate predictions of forest carbon stocks, providing deeper insights into ecosystem functioning and carbon cycling such as forest vulnerability to hydraulic and thermal stresses in the context of future climate change.
AB - Wood density is a fundamental property related to tree biomechanics and hydraulic function while playing a crucial role in assessing vegetation carbon stocks by linking volumetric retrieval and a mass estimate. This study provides a high-resolution map of the global distribution of tree wood density at the 0.01° (~1 km) spatial resolution, derived from four decision trees machine learning models using a global database of 28,822 tree-level wood density measurements. An ensemble of four top-performing models combined with eight cross-validation strategies shows great consistency, providing wood density patterns with pronounced spatial heterogeneity. The global pattern shows lower wood density values in northern and northwestern Europe, Canadian forest regions and slightly higher values in Siberia forests, western United States, and southern China. In contrast, tropical regions, especially wet tropical areas, exhibit high wood density. Climatic predictors explain 49%–63% of spatial variations, followed by vegetation characteristics (25%–31%) and edaphic properties (11%–16%). Notably, leaf type (evergreen vs. deciduous) and leaf habit type (broadleaved vs. needleleaved) are the most dominant individual features among all selected predictive covariates. Wood density tends to be higher for angiosperm broadleaf trees compared to gymnosperm needleleaf trees, particularly for evergreen species. The distributions of wood density categorized by leaf types and leaf habit types have good agreement with the features observed in wood density measurements. This global map quantifying wood density distribution can help improve accurate predictions of forest carbon stocks, providing deeper insights into ecosystem functioning and carbon cycling such as forest vulnerability to hydraulic and thermal stresses in the context of future climate change.
KW - carbon stocks
KW - climate stresses
KW - machine learning
KW - plant traits
KW - tree physiology
KW - vegetation resilience
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187449770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/gcb.17224
DO - 10.1111/gcb.17224
M3 - Article
C2 - 38459661
AN - SCOPUS:85187449770
SN - 1354-1013
VL - 30
JO - Global Change Biology
JF - Global Change Biology
IS - 3
M1 - e17224
ER -