Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 234-250 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | EARLY POPULAR VISUAL CULTURE |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2016 |
Keywords
- Gilles Deleuze
- David Martin-Jones
- Philosophy of film
- Early cinema
- Lumiere
- Malcolm Le Grice
Cite this
}
Gilles Deleuze and early cinema : The modernity of the emancipated time. / Viegas, Susana.
In: EARLY POPULAR VISUAL CULTURE, Vol. 14, No. 3, 08.2016, p. 234-250.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Gilles Deleuze and early cinema
T2 - The modernity of the emancipated time
AU - Viegas, Susana
N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBPD%2F94290%2F2013/PT# info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147240/PT# FRH/BPD/94290/2013 UID/FIL/00183/2013
PY - 2016/8
Y1 - 2016/8
N2 - Although the transition from the movement-image to the time-image is among the most commented-upon Deleuzian problems, Gilles Deleuze neglected the previous transition from images in movement' to the first regime of the movement-images. As my approach will be transhistorical, focusing especially on early silent movies and recently expanded cinema through early moving images (Lumiere Brothers) and 1970s structural films (Malcolm Le Grice), I will reflect on how we can think time and moving images outside of this closed Deleuzian movement-image/time-image conceptual framework. In other words, we can ask: how can we expand this conceptual framework? Drawing on David Martin-Jones' attraction-image', my aim is to explore the role of early cinema and the reasons for Gilles Deleuze's own historical and technical (mis)judgement of early silent cinema. In this sense, the emergent studies on the history of early silent movies, and the growing field of Deleuzian studies on film, together have an important role on the philosophical and historiographical analysis of film's expression of time and modernity.
AB - Although the transition from the movement-image to the time-image is among the most commented-upon Deleuzian problems, Gilles Deleuze neglected the previous transition from images in movement' to the first regime of the movement-images. As my approach will be transhistorical, focusing especially on early silent movies and recently expanded cinema through early moving images (Lumiere Brothers) and 1970s structural films (Malcolm Le Grice), I will reflect on how we can think time and moving images outside of this closed Deleuzian movement-image/time-image conceptual framework. In other words, we can ask: how can we expand this conceptual framework? Drawing on David Martin-Jones' attraction-image', my aim is to explore the role of early cinema and the reasons for Gilles Deleuze's own historical and technical (mis)judgement of early silent cinema. In this sense, the emergent studies on the history of early silent movies, and the growing field of Deleuzian studies on film, together have an important role on the philosophical and historiographical analysis of film's expression of time and modernity.
KW - Gilles Deleuze
KW - David Martin-Jones
KW - Philosophy of film
KW - Early cinema
KW - Lumiere
KW - Malcolm Le Grice
U2 - 10.1080/17460654.2016.1187075
DO - 10.1080/17460654.2016.1187075
M3 - Article
VL - 14
SP - 234
EP - 250
JO - EARLY POPULAR VISUAL CULTURE
JF - EARLY POPULAR VISUAL CULTURE
SN - 1746-0654
IS - 3
ER -