Genetic diversity and evolutionary relationships among Legionella pneumophila clinical isolates, Portugal, 1987 to 2012

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
48 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The genetic diversity of 89 clinical Legionella isolates, collected between 1987 and 2012, in 22 hospitals from the five regions of Portugal, was analysed in this study using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) of the Dresden panel and the sequence-based typing (SBT) protocol. The eBURST algorithm was used to infer levels of relatedness between isolates. All isolates collected were Legionella pneumophila, which were further characterised into four subgroups by MAbs, and 30 sequence types (STs) by SBT. Twelve of the STs were unique to Portugal; one of them (ST100) was represented by 32 epidemiologically related isolates. The ST44 was the profile with the highest number of epidemiologically unrelated isolates. The eBURST analyses indicate that, within the group formed by the 30 STs identified in this study, 17 STs were genetically close to at least another ST in the group. The comparison between the eBURST diagrams obtained with the STs from this study and the entire SBT database of the European Working Group for Legionella, showed that 24 (seven of them unique to Portugal) of our 30 STs were related with STs identified in others countries. These results suggest that the population of L. pneumophila clinical strains in Portugal includes both worldwide and local strains.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-39
Number of pages7
JournalEurosurveillance
Volume19
Issue number46
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2014

Keywords

  • MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY SUBGROUPS
  • SEQUENCE-BASED SCHEME
  • DISCRIMINATORY ABILITY
  • LEGIONNAIRES-DISEASE
  • SEROGROUPS
  • CULTURE
  • STRAINS
  • NEUA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genetic diversity and evolutionary relationships among Legionella pneumophila clinical isolates, Portugal, 1987 to 2012'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this