Fused in sarcoma undergoes cold denaturation: Implications for phase separation

Sara S. Félix, Douglas V. Laurents, Javier Oroz, Eurico J. Cabrita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The mediation of liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) for fused in sarcoma (FUS) protein is generally attributed to the low-complexity, disordered domains and is enhanced at low temperature. The role of FUS folded domains on the LLPS process remains relatively unknown since most studies are mainly based on fragmented FUS domains. Here, we investigate the effect of metabolites on full-length (FL) FUS LLPS using turbidity assays and differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy, and explore the behavior of the folded domains by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. FL FUS LLPS is maximal at low concentrations of glucose and glutamate, moderate concentrations of NaCl, Zn2+, and Ca2+ and at the isoelectric pH. The FUS RNA recognition motif (RRM) and zinc-finger (ZnF) domains are found to undergo cold denaturation above 0°C at a temperature that is determined by the conformational stability of the ZnF domain. Cold unfolding exposes buried nonpolar residues that can participate in LLPS-promoting hydrophobic interactions. Therefore, these findings constitute the first evidence that FUS globular domains may have an active role in LLPS under cold stress conditions and in the assembly of stress granules, providing further insight into the environmental regulation of LLPS.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere4521
Number of pages13
JournalProtein Science
Volume32
Issue number1
Early online date30 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2023

Keywords

  • cold denaturation
  • cold stress
  • fused in sarcoma (FUS)
  • liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS)
  • nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fused in sarcoma undergoes cold denaturation: Implications for phase separation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this