TY - JOUR
T1 - From the sea to aquafeed
T2 - A perspective overview
AU - Eroldoğan, Orhan Tufan
AU - Glencross, Brett
AU - Novoveska, Lucie
AU - Gaudêncio, Susana P.
AU - Rinkevich, Buki
AU - Varese, Giovanna Cristina
AU - de Fátima Carvalho, Maria
AU - Tasdemir, Deniz
AU - Safarik, Ivo
AU - Nielsen, Søren Laurentius
AU - Rebours, Céline
AU - Lada, Lukić Bilela
AU - Robbens, Johan
AU - Strode, Evita
AU - Haznedaroğlu, Berat Z.
AU - Kotta, Jonne
AU - Evliyaoğlu, Ece
AU - Oliveira, Juliana
AU - Girão, Mariana
AU - Vasquez, Marlen I.
AU - Čabarkapa, Ivana
AU - Rakita, Slađana
AU - Klun, Katja
AU - Rotter, Ana
N1 - Funding Information:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F04378%2F2020/PT#
This publication is based upon work from COST Action CA18238 (Ocean4Biotech), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) program, which provided open access support. Also, Orhan Tufan Eroldoğan gratefully acknowledges the Research Unit of Cukurova University for their financial support to achieve this review (Project no. FBA‐2020‐13387). Susana P. Gaudêncio and Juliana Oliveira would like to thank national funds from FCT–Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, IP, and the project LA/P/0140/2020 of the Associate Laboratory Institute for Health and Bioeconomy–i4HB finishing the research and the project Laboratory Institute for Health and Bioeconomy–i4HB, and also the projects OceanTreasures—PTDC/QUI‐QUI/119116/2010 and DIGIAqua—PTDC/EEI‐EEE/0415/2021. Evita Strode received financial grant from the ERDF 1.1.1.2 post‐doctoral project (1.1.1.2/VIAA/3/19/465). Ana Rotter and Katja Klun gratefully acknowledges the funding provided by the Slovenian Research Agency (Research core funding P4‐0432). Ana Rotter also acknowledges the Interreg MED Programme, cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund (Project No. 7032, internal ref. 8MED20_4.1_SP_001)–B‐Blue project for financing this work. Céline Rebours gratefully acknowledges the Research Council of Norway and Møreforsking AS for their financial support to achieve this review within the SAFER‐IMTA (Project no. 319577) and the SeaGreen (Project no. 312947) projects. Maria de Fátima Carvalho wishes to acknowledge the funding from ACTINODEEPSEA project (project no. PTDC/BIA‐MIC/31045/2017) co‐financed by COMPETE 2020, Portugal 2020, European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and FCT and Strategic Funding UIDB/04423/2020 and UIDP/04423/2020 through national funds provided by FCT and ERDF. Lukić Bilela Lada: the publication is part of a project that has received funding from the Erasmus+ Development of master curricula in ecological monitoring and aquatic bioassessment for Western Balkans HEIs/ECOBIAS (Project no. ECOBIAS_609967‐EPP‐1‐2019‐1‐RS‐EPPKA2‐CBHE‐JP; GA.2019‐1991/001‐001). Deniz Tasdemir acknowledges funding from European Union (Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme) to achieve this review within the project SUMMER (Grant Agreement 817806). Jonne Kotta acknowledge financial support from the EEA grant ‘Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation’ call I ‘Ecosystem resilience increased’ project ‘Impacts of invasive alien species and climate change on marine ecosystems in Estonia’. Slađana Rakita and Ivana Čabarkapa acknowledge the funding from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Grant number: 451‐03‐68/2022‐14/200222).
Funding Information:
ACTINODEEPSEA project and FCT‐Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Grant/Award Numbers: PTDC/BIA‐MIC/31045/2017, UIDB/04423/2020, UIDP/04423/2020; Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation” call I “Ecosystem resilience increased” project “Impacts of invasive alien species and climate change on marine ecosystems in Estonia; Erasmus+ Development of master curricula in ecological monitoring and aquatic bioassessment for Western Balkans, Grant/Award Number: ECOBIAS_609967‐EPP‐1‐2019‐1‐RS‐EPPKA2‐CBHE‐JP; GA; ERDF 1.1.1.2. post‐doctoral project, Grant/Award Number: 1.1.1.2/VIAA/3/19/465; European Union Agency for Network and Information Security, Grant/Award Number: 817806; FCT‐Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Grant/Award Numbers: LA/P/0140/2020, PTDC/EEI‐EEE/0415/2021, PTDC/QUI‐QUI/119116/2010, UIDP/04378/2020; Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, Grant/Award Number: 451‐03‐68/2022‐14/200222; Research Council of Norway and Møreforsking AS, Grant/Award Numbers: 312947, 319577; Research Unit of Cukurova University, Grant/Award Number: FBA‐2020‐13387; Slovenian Research Agency and European Regional Development Fund, Grant/Award Numbers: 7032, internal ref. 8MED20_4.1_SP_001, P4‐0432 Funding information
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Reviews in Aquaculture published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PY - 2022/10/3
Y1 - 2022/10/3
N2 - Aquaculture has been one of the fastest-growing food production systems sectors for over three decades. With its growth, the demand for alternative, cheaper and high-quality feed ingredients is also increasing. Innovation investments on providing new functional feed alternatives have yielded several viable alternative raw materials. Considering all the current feed ingredients, their circular adaption in the aquafeed manufacturing industry is clearly of the utmost importance to achieve sustainable aquaculture in the near future. The use of terrestrial plant materials and animal by-products predominantly used in aquafeed ingredients puts a heavily reliance on terrestrial agroecosystems, which also has its own sustainability concerns. Therefore, the aquafeed industry needs to progress with functional and sustainable alternative raw materials for feed that must be more resilient and consistent, considering a circular perspective. In this review, we assess the current trends in using various marine organisms, ranging from microorganisms (including fungi, thraustochytrids, microalgae and bacteria) to macroalgae and macroinvertebrates as viable biological feed resources. This review focuses on the trend of circular use of resources and the development of new value chains. In this, we present a perspective of promoting novel circular economy value chains that promote the re-use of biological resources as valuable feed ingredients. Thus, we highlight some potentially important marine-derived resources that deserve further investigations for improving or addressing circular aquaculture.
AB - Aquaculture has been one of the fastest-growing food production systems sectors for over three decades. With its growth, the demand for alternative, cheaper and high-quality feed ingredients is also increasing. Innovation investments on providing new functional feed alternatives have yielded several viable alternative raw materials. Considering all the current feed ingredients, their circular adaption in the aquafeed manufacturing industry is clearly of the utmost importance to achieve sustainable aquaculture in the near future. The use of terrestrial plant materials and animal by-products predominantly used in aquafeed ingredients puts a heavily reliance on terrestrial agroecosystems, which also has its own sustainability concerns. Therefore, the aquafeed industry needs to progress with functional and sustainable alternative raw materials for feed that must be more resilient and consistent, considering a circular perspective. In this review, we assess the current trends in using various marine organisms, ranging from microorganisms (including fungi, thraustochytrids, microalgae and bacteria) to macroalgae and macroinvertebrates as viable biological feed resources. This review focuses on the trend of circular use of resources and the development of new value chains. In this, we present a perspective of promoting novel circular economy value chains that promote the re-use of biological resources as valuable feed ingredients. Thus, we highlight some potentially important marine-derived resources that deserve further investigations for improving or addressing circular aquaculture.
KW - alternative protein
KW - aquafeed
KW - circular aquaculture
KW - fatty acid
KW - lipids
KW - single cell protein
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139122386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/raq.12740
DO - 10.1111/raq.12740
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85139122386
SN - 1753-5123
JO - Reviews in Aquaculture
JF - Reviews in Aquaculture
ER -