TY - JOUR
T1 - Follow-up on commitments at the Third Global Forum on Human Resources for Health
T2 - Indonesia, Sudan, Tanzania
AU - Dussault, Gilles
AU - Badr, Elsheikh
AU - Haroen, Hartiah
AU - Mapunda, Martin
AU - Mars, Achmad Soebagja Tancarino
AU - Pritasari, Kirana
AU - Cometto, Giorgio
PY - 2016/4/26
Y1 - 2016/4/26
N2 - This study sought to assess actions which Indonesia, Sudan, and Tanzania took to implement the health workforce commitments they made at the Third Global Forum on Human Resources for Health (HRH) in November 2013. The study was conducted through a survey of published and gray literature in English and field research consisting of direct contacts with relevant ministries and agencies. Results show that the three countries implemented interventions to translate their commitments into actions. The three countries focused their commitments on improving the availability, geographical accessibility, quality of education, and performance of health workers. The implementation of the Recife commitments primarily entailed initiatives at the central level, such as the adoption of new legislation or the development of accreditation mechanisms. This study shows that action is more likely to take place when policy documents explicitly recognize and document HRH problems, when stakeholders are involved in the formulation and the implementation of policy changes, and when external support is available. The Recife Forum appears to have created an opportunity to advance the HRH policy agenda, and advocates of health workforce development in these three countries took advantage of it.
AB - This study sought to assess actions which Indonesia, Sudan, and Tanzania took to implement the health workforce commitments they made at the Third Global Forum on Human Resources for Health (HRH) in November 2013. The study was conducted through a survey of published and gray literature in English and field research consisting of direct contacts with relevant ministries and agencies. Results show that the three countries implemented interventions to translate their commitments into actions. The three countries focused their commitments on improving the availability, geographical accessibility, quality of education, and performance of health workers. The implementation of the Recife commitments primarily entailed initiatives at the central level, such as the adoption of new legislation or the development of accreditation mechanisms. This study shows that action is more likely to take place when policy documents explicitly recognize and document HRH problems, when stakeholders are involved in the formulation and the implementation of policy changes, and when external support is available. The Recife Forum appears to have created an opportunity to advance the HRH policy agenda, and advocates of health workforce development in these three countries took advantage of it.
KW - Evaluation
KW - Health workforce commitments
KW - Health workforce policies
KW - Indonesia
KW - Monitoring
KW - Policy analysis
KW - Sudan
KW - Tanzania
KW - Third Global Forum
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965047231&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12960-016-0112-0
DO - 10.1186/s12960-016-0112-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 27117822
AN - SCOPUS:84965047231
VL - 14
JO - Human resources for health
JF - Human resources for health
IS - 1
M1 - 16
ER -