Focused Correlation and Confirmation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay presents results about a deviation from independence measure called focused correlation. This measure explicates the formal relationship between probabilistic dependence of an evidence set and the incremental confirmation of a hypothesis, resolves a basic question underlying Peter Klein and Ted Warfield's "truth-conduciveness" problem for Bayesian coherentism, and provides a qualified rebuttal to Erik Olsson's claim that there is no informative link between correlation and confirmation. The generality of the result is compared to recent programs in Bayesian epistemology that attempt to link correlation and confirmation by utilizing a conditional evidential independence condition. Several properties of focused correlation are also highlighted.
Original languageUnknown
Pages (from-to)79-100
JournalThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume60
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009

Cite this