TY - JOUR
T1 - Fisher's perceptions on shark fisheries in Sao Tome Island (Gulf of Guinea, West Africa)
AU - Pissarra, Vasco
AU - Santana, Aristides
AU - Panisi, Martina
AU - Santos, Catarina Pereira
AU - Maia, Hugulay
AU - Vasconcelos, Lia
AU - Nuno, Ana
AU - Porriños, Guillermo
AU - da Silva, Carina Vieira
AU - Rosa, Rui
AU - Santos, Catarina Frazão
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is part of project NGANDU (\u201CThe Importance of Shark Populations and Sustainable Ocean Use for Human Well-being in Cape Verde and Sao Tome and Principe, West Africa\u201D) funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) and the Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN) under grant agreement FCT-AGA-KHAN/541746579/2019. VP acknowledges funding from FCT doctoral grant 2020.05435.BD. MP acknowledges funding from FCT doctoral grant PD/BD/140814/2018. CPS acknowledges funding from a research grant from Nova School of Business and Economics (Nova SBE/BI/2022/13), under the project NGANDU. CVS acknowledges funding from FCT research contract under program UIDB/00124/2020 and UIDP/00124/2020. CFS acknowledges funding from FCT research contract 2020.03704.CEECIND. VP, RR, CVS, CPS and CFS acknowledge funding from strategic projects granted to MARE (UIDB/04292/2020) and the Associate Laboratory ARNET (LA/P/0069/2020). A deep acknowledgment to all participating fishers for sharing their knowledge and time, and invaluable input. The authors would like to thank Dire\u00E7\u00E3o das Pescas de S\u00E3o Tom\u00E9 e Pr\u00EDncipe, Dire\u00E7\u00E3o do Ambiente de S\u00E3o Tom\u00E9 e Pr\u00EDncipe, ALISEI, OIKOS and MARAPA for their support during the study. VP, RR and CFS conceptualized the study. CFS, CVS and VP designed the survey. VP, AS and MP conducted the interviews. VP, RR and CFS analysed the data. VP and CFS produced the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding Information:
This research is part of project NGANDU (\u201CThe Importance of Shark Populations and Sustainable Ocean Use for Human Well-being in Cape Verde and Sao Tome and Principe, West Africa\u201D) funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) and the Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN) under grant agreement FCT-AGA-KHAN/541746579/2019. VP acknowledges funding from FCT doctoral grant 2020.05435.BD. MP acknowledges funding from FCT doctoral grant PD/BD/140814/2018. CVS acknowledges funding from FCT research contract under program UIDB/00124/2020 and UIDP/00124/2020. CFS acknowledges funding from FCT research contract 2020.03704.CEECIND. VP, RR, CVS and CFS acknowledge funding from strategic projects granted to MARE (UIDB/04292/2020) and the Associate Laboratory ARNET (LA/P/0069/2020). A deep acknowledgment to all participating fishers for sharing their knowledge and time, and invaluable input. The authors would like to thank Dire\u00E7\u00E3o das Pescas de S\u00E3o Tom\u00E9 e Pr\u00EDncipe, Dire\u00E7\u00E3o do Ambiente de S\u00E3o Tom\u00E9 e Pr\u00EDncipe, ALISEI, OIKOS and MARAPA for their support during the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/12/10
Y1 - 2024/12/10
N2 - Sao Tome and Principe (STP) is a small island developing state in the Gulf of Guinea (West Africa) and is considered a global hotspot of marine biodiversity. Still, detailed information on sharks’ diversity, abundance, and respective fisheries is mainly absent. Here, we interviewed fishers from different local communities of the island of Sao Tome to characterize: i) local knowledge on shark fisheries, ii) those reliant upon these resources, and iii) their perceptions about shark populations and their importance on Sao Tome Island. A total of 111 semi-structured interviews were conducted between May 6 and June 15, 2019, in 11 fishing communities. Ninety-seven percent of fishers mentioned that sharks are present in their fishing grounds, and 98 % reported that they catch sharks. The species most identified by fishers (77 %) was the scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini), followed by the bluntnose sixgill shark (Hexanchus griseus; 33 %), white shark (Carcharodon carcharias; 31 %), longfin mako shark (Isurus paucus; 29 %), pigeye shark (Carcharhinus amboinensis; 27 %), and other six species (under 20 % each). Sixty-two percent of interviewees perceived sharks as a threat to their safety and livelihoods. When asked if sharks should be protected, 59 % of fishers agreed, while 40 % did not consider it necessary. Common reasons in support of protection were that sharks were disappearing (23 %), important for ocean health (9 %), and overfished (5 %). Most fishers (89 %) noticed shark abundance changes, decreasing over the past 15 years. Regarding the underlying causes, the most common response was the increase in the fishing pressure from international fishing fleets (72 %). We argue that raising awareness and building capacity close to local communities on sharks' essential role and importance will be fundamental to supporting future conservation measures, as misinformation and prejudice against sharks are widespread.
AB - Sao Tome and Principe (STP) is a small island developing state in the Gulf of Guinea (West Africa) and is considered a global hotspot of marine biodiversity. Still, detailed information on sharks’ diversity, abundance, and respective fisheries is mainly absent. Here, we interviewed fishers from different local communities of the island of Sao Tome to characterize: i) local knowledge on shark fisheries, ii) those reliant upon these resources, and iii) their perceptions about shark populations and their importance on Sao Tome Island. A total of 111 semi-structured interviews were conducted between May 6 and June 15, 2019, in 11 fishing communities. Ninety-seven percent of fishers mentioned that sharks are present in their fishing grounds, and 98 % reported that they catch sharks. The species most identified by fishers (77 %) was the scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini), followed by the bluntnose sixgill shark (Hexanchus griseus; 33 %), white shark (Carcharodon carcharias; 31 %), longfin mako shark (Isurus paucus; 29 %), pigeye shark (Carcharhinus amboinensis; 27 %), and other six species (under 20 % each). Sixty-two percent of interviewees perceived sharks as a threat to their safety and livelihoods. When asked if sharks should be protected, 59 % of fishers agreed, while 40 % did not consider it necessary. Common reasons in support of protection were that sharks were disappearing (23 %), important for ocean health (9 %), and overfished (5 %). Most fishers (89 %) noticed shark abundance changes, decreasing over the past 15 years. Regarding the underlying causes, the most common response was the increase in the fishing pressure from international fishing fleets (72 %). We argue that raising awareness and building capacity close to local communities on sharks' essential role and importance will be fundamental to supporting future conservation measures, as misinformation and prejudice against sharks are widespread.
KW - Elasmobranchs
KW - Perceptions
KW - Small Island Developing States
KW - Small-scale fisheries
KW - Sustainable Ocean use
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199480440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103711
DO - 10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103711
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85199480440
SN - 2352-4855
VL - 77
JO - Regional Studies in Marine Science
JF - Regional Studies in Marine Science
M1 - 103711
ER -