Extended producer responsibility

A differential fee model for promoting sustainable packaging

Ana Lúcia Lourenço Pires, Maria da Graça Madeira Martinho, Rita Ribeiro, Mafalda Mota, Luís Teixeira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Extended producer responsibility in the European Union has been shown to be incapable of promoting environmentally friendly packaging, mainly because of the economic instrument used: the producer fee. To make the producer fee capable of both reflecting and influencing how packaging is produced, we propose a mathematical model for calculating a differential fee (the sustainable producer fee or SPF). The development of the model involves the following steps: the selection of sustainability criteria, the aggregation of criteria using multi-criteria decision making, the formulation of the SPF calculation, and the generation of a web-based interface for packers and product importers to calculate the differential fee applying to their own packaging. The aspects of sustainability considered are environmental aspects resulting mostly from life cycle assessment (e.g., global warming and human toxicity), and social aspects related to environmental information present in/on the packaging (e.g., the recycling bin symbol and carbon footprint information). The mathematical model developed uses the sustainability results provided by the multi-criteria decision making. The fee is higher than the current fixed fee (200.8€/t) if the level of sustainability is low, that is, if environmental and social impacts are negative, and is lower if the level of sustainability is high. The lowest value of the fee in the sensitivity analysis, 191.89€/t, was calculated for polyethylene packaging containing 10% of incorporated recycled material, with this recycling information being present in the packaging along with carbon footprint information and the recycling symbol. The highest value, 218.69€/t, was calculated for polyvinyl chloride packaging without any recycled material and without any environmental information. The model is implemented in a web-based interface, where packers and product importers are able to simulate different types of packaging to reduce the fee. The success of the approach is discussed, as is the potential for changing the packaging behavior of packers and importers and for increasing the level of sustainability of packaging in the near future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)343-353
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume108
Issue numberPart A
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Packaging
Sustainable development
sustainability
Packers
Recycling
Carbon footprint
carbon footprint
recycling
Decision making
decision making
responsibility
fee
packaging
Extended producer responsibility
Fees
Mathematical models
Social aspects
economic instrument
social impact
Bins

Keywords

  • Analytical hierarchy process (AHP)
  • Environmental information
  • Life cycle assessment impacts
  • Sustainable packaging
  • Sustainable producer fee (SPF)
  • Technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS)

Cite this

@article{6d72aa066b2742f8ac10947bd1e84b42,
title = "Extended producer responsibility: A differential fee model for promoting sustainable packaging",
abstract = "Extended producer responsibility in the European Union has been shown to be incapable of promoting environmentally friendly packaging, mainly because of the economic instrument used: the producer fee. To make the producer fee capable of both reflecting and influencing how packaging is produced, we propose a mathematical model for calculating a differential fee (the sustainable producer fee or SPF). The development of the model involves the following steps: the selection of sustainability criteria, the aggregation of criteria using multi-criteria decision making, the formulation of the SPF calculation, and the generation of a web-based interface for packers and product importers to calculate the differential fee applying to their own packaging. The aspects of sustainability considered are environmental aspects resulting mostly from life cycle assessment (e.g., global warming and human toxicity), and social aspects related to environmental information present in/on the packaging (e.g., the recycling bin symbol and carbon footprint information). The mathematical model developed uses the sustainability results provided by the multi-criteria decision making. The fee is higher than the current fixed fee (200.8€/t) if the level of sustainability is low, that is, if environmental and social impacts are negative, and is lower if the level of sustainability is high. The lowest value of the fee in the sensitivity analysis, 191.89€/t, was calculated for polyethylene packaging containing 10{\%} of incorporated recycled material, with this recycling information being present in the packaging along with carbon footprint information and the recycling symbol. The highest value, 218.69€/t, was calculated for polyvinyl chloride packaging without any recycled material and without any environmental information. The model is implemented in a web-based interface, where packers and product importers are able to simulate different types of packaging to reduce the fee. The success of the approach is discussed, as is the potential for changing the packaging behavior of packers and importers and for increasing the level of sustainability of packaging in the near future.",
keywords = "Analytical hierarchy process (AHP), Environmental information, Life cycle assessment impacts, Sustainable packaging, Sustainable producer fee (SPF), Technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS)",
author = "Pires, {Ana L{\'u}cia Louren{\cc}o} and Martinho, {Maria da Gra{\cc}a Madeira} and Rita Ribeiro and Mafalda Mota and Lu{\'i}s Teixeira",
note = "Sem PDF. This work was performed within the PoVeRE project and was financed by Sociedade Ponto Verde, S.A., for which the authors express their gratitude.",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.084",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "343--353",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.",
number = "Part A",

}

Extended producer responsibility : A differential fee model for promoting sustainable packaging. / Pires, Ana Lúcia Lourenço; Martinho, Maria da Graça Madeira; Ribeiro, Rita; Mota, Mafalda; Teixeira, Luís.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 108, No. Part A, 01.12.2015, p. 343-353.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extended producer responsibility

T2 - A differential fee model for promoting sustainable packaging

AU - Pires, Ana Lúcia Lourenço

AU - Martinho, Maria da Graça Madeira

AU - Ribeiro, Rita

AU - Mota, Mafalda

AU - Teixeira, Luís

N1 - Sem PDF. This work was performed within the PoVeRE project and was financed by Sociedade Ponto Verde, S.A., for which the authors express their gratitude.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Extended producer responsibility in the European Union has been shown to be incapable of promoting environmentally friendly packaging, mainly because of the economic instrument used: the producer fee. To make the producer fee capable of both reflecting and influencing how packaging is produced, we propose a mathematical model for calculating a differential fee (the sustainable producer fee or SPF). The development of the model involves the following steps: the selection of sustainability criteria, the aggregation of criteria using multi-criteria decision making, the formulation of the SPF calculation, and the generation of a web-based interface for packers and product importers to calculate the differential fee applying to their own packaging. The aspects of sustainability considered are environmental aspects resulting mostly from life cycle assessment (e.g., global warming and human toxicity), and social aspects related to environmental information present in/on the packaging (e.g., the recycling bin symbol and carbon footprint information). The mathematical model developed uses the sustainability results provided by the multi-criteria decision making. The fee is higher than the current fixed fee (200.8€/t) if the level of sustainability is low, that is, if environmental and social impacts are negative, and is lower if the level of sustainability is high. The lowest value of the fee in the sensitivity analysis, 191.89€/t, was calculated for polyethylene packaging containing 10% of incorporated recycled material, with this recycling information being present in the packaging along with carbon footprint information and the recycling symbol. The highest value, 218.69€/t, was calculated for polyvinyl chloride packaging without any recycled material and without any environmental information. The model is implemented in a web-based interface, where packers and product importers are able to simulate different types of packaging to reduce the fee. The success of the approach is discussed, as is the potential for changing the packaging behavior of packers and importers and for increasing the level of sustainability of packaging in the near future.

AB - Extended producer responsibility in the European Union has been shown to be incapable of promoting environmentally friendly packaging, mainly because of the economic instrument used: the producer fee. To make the producer fee capable of both reflecting and influencing how packaging is produced, we propose a mathematical model for calculating a differential fee (the sustainable producer fee or SPF). The development of the model involves the following steps: the selection of sustainability criteria, the aggregation of criteria using multi-criteria decision making, the formulation of the SPF calculation, and the generation of a web-based interface for packers and product importers to calculate the differential fee applying to their own packaging. The aspects of sustainability considered are environmental aspects resulting mostly from life cycle assessment (e.g., global warming and human toxicity), and social aspects related to environmental information present in/on the packaging (e.g., the recycling bin symbol and carbon footprint information). The mathematical model developed uses the sustainability results provided by the multi-criteria decision making. The fee is higher than the current fixed fee (200.8€/t) if the level of sustainability is low, that is, if environmental and social impacts are negative, and is lower if the level of sustainability is high. The lowest value of the fee in the sensitivity analysis, 191.89€/t, was calculated for polyethylene packaging containing 10% of incorporated recycled material, with this recycling information being present in the packaging along with carbon footprint information and the recycling symbol. The highest value, 218.69€/t, was calculated for polyvinyl chloride packaging without any recycled material and without any environmental information. The model is implemented in a web-based interface, where packers and product importers are able to simulate different types of packaging to reduce the fee. The success of the approach is discussed, as is the potential for changing the packaging behavior of packers and importers and for increasing the level of sustainability of packaging in the near future.

KW - Analytical hierarchy process (AHP)

KW - Environmental information

KW - Life cycle assessment impacts

KW - Sustainable packaging

KW - Sustainable producer fee (SPF)

KW - Technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938252587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.084

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.084

M3 - Article

VL - 108

SP - 343

EP - 353

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

IS - Part A

ER -