TY - JOUR
T1 - Expertise and policy-making
T2 - Main actors, debates and outcomes in the making of the Portuguese railway network (1850–90)
AU - Pereira, Hugo S.
N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBD%2F46011%2F2008/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBPD%2F95212%2F2013/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147244/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147247/PT#
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - In the second half of the nineteenth century, Portugal built the main branches of its railway system. In this paper, I will use technical and military reports, parliamentary debates and sundry bibliography to analyse the influence of the different stakeholders. I investigated the expectations, priorities and agendas of engineers, army officers, policymakers and lobbyists in the design of the Portuguese railway network. I argue that historiography about Portuguese railways usually considers the rationale behind their discussion as entirely technological and focuses mainly on their outputs, taking railways for granted, or black-boxed. However, the planification of large transportation systems depends on the sociotechnical context and on hierarchies of power of their time. I will show that experts (mostly engineers) played a decisive role in the planning of the network, but a large part of its design was due to non-technical issues, including political machinations, budgetary constraints and corporative lobbying.
AB - In the second half of the nineteenth century, Portugal built the main branches of its railway system. In this paper, I will use technical and military reports, parliamentary debates and sundry bibliography to analyse the influence of the different stakeholders. I investigated the expectations, priorities and agendas of engineers, army officers, policymakers and lobbyists in the design of the Portuguese railway network. I argue that historiography about Portuguese railways usually considers the rationale behind their discussion as entirely technological and focuses mainly on their outputs, taking railways for granted, or black-boxed. However, the planification of large transportation systems depends on the sociotechnical context and on hierarchies of power of their time. I will show that experts (mostly engineers) played a decisive role in the planning of the network, but a large part of its design was due to non-technical issues, including political machinations, budgetary constraints and corporative lobbying.
KW - black-boxing
KW - Planning
KW - policy-making
KW - Saint-Simonianism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083229774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0022526620908585
DO - 10.1177/0022526620908585
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85083229774
SN - 0022-5266
VL - 42
SP - 58
EP - 80
JO - Journal of Transport History
JF - Journal of Transport History
IS - 1
ER -