Expertise and policy-making: Main actors, debates and outcomes in the making of the Portuguese railway network (1850–90)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
323 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the second half of the nineteenth century, Portugal built the main branches of its railway system. In this paper, I will use technical and military reports, parliamentary debates and sundry bibliography to analyse the influence of the different stakeholders. I investigated the expectations, priorities and agendas of engineers, army officers, policymakers and lobbyists in the design of the Portuguese railway network. I argue that historiography about Portuguese railways usually considers the rationale behind their discussion as entirely technological and focuses mainly on their outputs, taking railways for granted, or black-boxed. However, the planification of large transportation systems depends on the sociotechnical context and on hierarchies of power of their time. I will show that experts (mostly engineers) played a decisive role in the planning of the network, but a large part of its design was due to non-technical issues, including political machinations, budgetary constraints and corporative lobbying.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)58-80
JournalJournal of Transport History
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • black-boxing
  • Planning
  • policy-making
  • Saint-Simonianism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Expertise and policy-making: Main actors, debates and outcomes in the making of the Portuguese railway network (1850–90)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this