TY - JOUR
T1 - Experiences of care perceived by users of supported accommodations for people with serious mental disorders
T2 - Can they impact quality of life?
AU - Pedrosa, Bárbara
AU - Cardoso, Graça
AU - Azeredo-Lopes, Sofia
AU - Aluh, Deborah
AU - Grigaitė, Ugnė
AU - Dias, Margarida
AU - Silva, Manuela
AU - Caldas de Almeida, José
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The study was funded by the General Health Directorate of the Ministry of Health, which was not involved in any of the study aspects – design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, writing of the paper and submission to publication. Authors Bárbara Pedrosa and Ugnė Grigaitė are PhD candidates funded by Fundação Ciência and Tecnologia (FCT) (UI/BD/151072/2021 and (UI/BD/151073/2021, accordingly) and author Deborah Aluh is a PhD candidate funded by LaCaixa Foundation (LCF/BQ/DI20/1178001).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Background: To understand if supported accommodations (SA) are promoting the recovery of people with serious mental disorders, quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome. This study aimed to analyse the association between QoL and experiences of care in general and to identify specific experiences of care that are associated with QoL in users of SA. Methods: A random sample of users of 42 SA was interviewed to obtain standardized measures of QoL and personal experiences of care. The sample was also characterized according to sociodemographic and clinical aspects. Linear regressions models analysed the association between QoL and experiences of care, adjusting for potential confounders. Results include estimated regression coefficients, corresponding 95% confidence intervals and p-values. Results: The number of users interviewed was 272. The median QoL was 4.9 (2.3–6.8) out of 7. Although 84.9% of users were satisfied with the care received, only 16.2% felt involved in their treatment. Feeling safe (β =.73; 95% CI [0.22–1.24], p =.006) and having privacy (β =.42; 95% CI [0.09–0.75], p =.014) influenced QoL. Involvement in care (β =.44; 95% CI [0.13–0.74], p =.006), safety and privacy (β =.72; 95% CI [0.44–0.99], p = 8.38e-07) and user-professional relationship (β =.42; 95% CI [0.14–0.69], p =.003) were also associated with QoL. Conclusions: Feeling safe, having privacy, feeling involved in care and having good user-professional relationships influence the QoL of users. These findings have implications from the political and economic level to the organizational and individual levels.
AB - Background: To understand if supported accommodations (SA) are promoting the recovery of people with serious mental disorders, quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome. This study aimed to analyse the association between QoL and experiences of care in general and to identify specific experiences of care that are associated with QoL in users of SA. Methods: A random sample of users of 42 SA was interviewed to obtain standardized measures of QoL and personal experiences of care. The sample was also characterized according to sociodemographic and clinical aspects. Linear regressions models analysed the association between QoL and experiences of care, adjusting for potential confounders. Results include estimated regression coefficients, corresponding 95% confidence intervals and p-values. Results: The number of users interviewed was 272. The median QoL was 4.9 (2.3–6.8) out of 7. Although 84.9% of users were satisfied with the care received, only 16.2% felt involved in their treatment. Feeling safe (β =.73; 95% CI [0.22–1.24], p =.006) and having privacy (β =.42; 95% CI [0.09–0.75], p =.014) influenced QoL. Involvement in care (β =.44; 95% CI [0.13–0.74], p =.006), safety and privacy (β =.72; 95% CI [0.44–0.99], p = 8.38e-07) and user-professional relationship (β =.42; 95% CI [0.14–0.69], p =.003) were also associated with QoL. Conclusions: Feeling safe, having privacy, feeling involved in care and having good user-professional relationships influence the QoL of users. These findings have implications from the political and economic level to the organizational and individual levels.
KW - experiences of care
KW - quality of life
KW - recovery
KW - Supported accommodations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141013176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00207640221127928
DO - 10.1177/00207640221127928
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85141013176
SN - 0020-7640
VL - 69
SP - 626
EP - 638
JO - International Journal of Social Psychiatry
JF - International Journal of Social Psychiatry
IS - 3
ER -