Evaluating scenario-based SPL requirements approaches: The case for modularity, stability and expressiveness

Mauricio Alférez, Rodrigo Bonifacio, Leopoldo Teixeira, Paola Accioly, Uira Kulesza, Ana Maria Diniz Moreira, João Baptista da Silva Araújo Júnior, Paulo Borba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)


Software product lines (SPL) provide support for productivity gains through systematic reuse. Among the various quality attributes supporting these goals, modularity, stability and expressiveness of feature specifications, their composition and configuration knowledge emerge as strategic values in modern software development paradigms. This paper presents a metric-based evaluation aiming at assessing how well the chosen qualities are supported by scenario-based SPL requirements approaches. The selected approaches for this study span from type of notation (textual or graphical based), style to support variability (annotation or composition based), and specification expressiveness. They are compared using the metrics developed in a set of releases from an exemplar case study. Our major findings indicate that composition-based approaches have greater potential to support modularity and stability, and that quantification mechanisms simplify and increase expressiveness of configuration knowledge and composition specifications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-376
JournalRequirements Engineering
Issue number4(SI)
Publication statusPublished - 12 Oct 2014


  • Requirements specification
  • Software product lines
  • Use scenarios
  • Variability modeling


Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating scenario-based SPL requirements approaches: The case for modularity, stability and expressiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this