TY - JOUR
T1 - Ernst Mach’s Contribution to the Philosophy of Science in Light of Mary B. Hesse’s Post-Empiricism
AU - Gori, Pietro
N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00183%2F2020/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F00183%2F2020/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/DL 57%2F2016/DL 57%2F2016%2FCP1453%2FCT0018/PT#
UIDB/00183/2020
UIDP/00183/2020
DL 57/2016/CP1453/CT0018
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Ernst Mach’s definition of the relationship between thoughts and facts is well known, but the question of how Mach conceived of their actual relationship has received much less attention. This paper aims to address this gap in light of Mary B. Hesse’s view of a postempiricist approach to natural science. As this paper will show, this view is characterized by a constructivist conception of the relationship between theory and facts that seems to be consistent with Mach’s observations on scientific knowledge. The paper first explores Hesse’s account of postempiricism and her project of a new epistemology. It then considers Ernst Mach’s conception of facts as the middle term of a triad of concepts that includes thoughts and elements as extreme terms. Finally, the paper will offer concluding remarks on Mach’s contribution to the debate on scientific realism and his attempt to redefine the notions of correspondence and objectivity in science.
AB - Ernst Mach’s definition of the relationship between thoughts and facts is well known, but the question of how Mach conceived of their actual relationship has received much less attention. This paper aims to address this gap in light of Mary B. Hesse’s view of a postempiricist approach to natural science. As this paper will show, this view is characterized by a constructivist conception of the relationship between theory and facts that seems to be consistent with Mach’s observations on scientific knowledge. The paper first explores Hesse’s account of postempiricism and her project of a new epistemology. It then considers Ernst Mach’s conception of facts as the middle term of a triad of concepts that includes thoughts and elements as extreme terms. Finally, the paper will offer concluding remarks on Mach’s contribution to the debate on scientific realism and his attempt to redefine the notions of correspondence and objectivity in science.
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000695232700001
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85115038258&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&featureToggles=FEATURE_NEW_DOC_DETAILS_EXPORT:1
U2 - 10.1086/715876
DO - 10.1086/715876
M3 - Article
SN - 2152-5188
VL - 11
SP - 383
EP - 411
JO - HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science
JF - HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science
IS - 2
ER -