TY - JOUR
T1 - Environment-sensitivity functions for gross primary productivity in light use efficiency models
AU - Bao, Shanning
AU - Wutzler, Thomas
AU - Koirala, Sujan
AU - Cuntz, Matthias
AU - Ibrom, Andreas
AU - Besnard, Simon
AU - Walther, Sophia
AU - Šigut, Ladislav
AU - Moreno, Álvaro
AU - Weber, Ulrich
AU - Wohlfahrt, Georg
AU - Cleverly, Jamie
AU - Migliavacca, Mirco
AU - Woodgate, William
AU - Merbold, Lutz
AU - Veenendaal, Elmar
AU - Carvalhais, Nuno
N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/3599-PPCDT/PTDC%2FAAG-MAA%2F3699%2F2014/PT#
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - The sensitivity of photosynthesis to environmental changes is essential for understanding carbon cycle responses to global climate change and for the development of modeling approaches that explains its spatial and temporal variability. We collected a large variety of published sensitivity functions of gross primary productivity (GPP) to different forcing variables to assess the response of GPP to environmental factors. These include the responses of GPP to temperature; vapor pressure deficit, some of which include the response to atmospheric CO2 concentrations; soil water availability (W); light intensity; and cloudiness. These functions were combined in a full factorial light use efficiency (LUE) model structure, leading to a collection of 5600 distinct LUE models. Each model was optimized against daily GPP and evapotranspiration fluxes from 196 FLUXNET sites and ranked across sites based on a bootstrap approach. The GPP sensitivity to each environmental factor, including CO2 fertilization, was shown to be significant, and that none of the previously published model structures performed as well as the best model selected. From daily and weekly to monthly scales, the best model's median Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency across sites was 0.73, 0.79 and 0.82, respectively, but poorer at annual scales (0.23), emphasizing the common limitation of current models in describing the interannual variability of GPP. Although the best global model did not match the local best model at each site, the selection was robust across ecosystem types. The contribution of light saturation and cloudiness to GPP was observed across all biomes (from 23% to 43%). Temperature and W dominates GPP and LUE but responses of GPP to temperature and W are lagged in cold and arid ecosystems, respectively. The findings of this study provide a foundation towards more robust LUE-based estimates of global GPP and may provide a benchmark for other empirical GPP products.
AB - The sensitivity of photosynthesis to environmental changes is essential for understanding carbon cycle responses to global climate change and for the development of modeling approaches that explains its spatial and temporal variability. We collected a large variety of published sensitivity functions of gross primary productivity (GPP) to different forcing variables to assess the response of GPP to environmental factors. These include the responses of GPP to temperature; vapor pressure deficit, some of which include the response to atmospheric CO2 concentrations; soil water availability (W); light intensity; and cloudiness. These functions were combined in a full factorial light use efficiency (LUE) model structure, leading to a collection of 5600 distinct LUE models. Each model was optimized against daily GPP and evapotranspiration fluxes from 196 FLUXNET sites and ranked across sites based on a bootstrap approach. The GPP sensitivity to each environmental factor, including CO2 fertilization, was shown to be significant, and that none of the previously published model structures performed as well as the best model selected. From daily and weekly to monthly scales, the best model's median Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency across sites was 0.73, 0.79 and 0.82, respectively, but poorer at annual scales (0.23), emphasizing the common limitation of current models in describing the interannual variability of GPP. Although the best global model did not match the local best model at each site, the selection was robust across ecosystem types. The contribution of light saturation and cloudiness to GPP was observed across all biomes (from 23% to 43%). Temperature and W dominates GPP and LUE but responses of GPP to temperature and W are lagged in cold and arid ecosystems, respectively. The findings of this study provide a foundation towards more robust LUE-based estimates of global GPP and may provide a benchmark for other empirical GPP products.
KW - Carbon assimilation
KW - Diffuse fraction
KW - Model comparison
KW - Model equifinality
KW - Radiation use efficiency
KW - Randomly sampled sites
KW - Sensitivity formulations
KW - Temporal scales
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119366965&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108708
DO - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108708
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85119366965
SN - 0168-1923
VL - 312
SP - 1
EP - 23
JO - Agricultural And Forest Meteorology
JF - Agricultural And Forest Meteorology
M1 - 108708
ER -