TY - JOUR
T1 - Entrepreneurial pitching
T2 - A critical review and integrative framework
AU - Kalvapalle, Sai Gayathri
AU - Phillips, Nelson
AU - Cornelissen, Joep
N1 - Copyright: Academy of Management, all rights reserved. Contents may not be copied, emailed, posted to a listserv, or otherwise transmitted without the copyright holder's express
written permission. Users may print, download, or email articles for individual use only.
Funding: We are very grateful to Bill McEvily for his meticulous editorial guidance and expertise throughout the review process, and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. Sai Gayathri Kalvapalle gratefully acknowledges funding from the Fundac\u00B8\u00E3o para a Ci\u00EAncia e a Tecnologia (UIDB/00124/2020, UIDP/00124/ 2020 and Social Sciences DataLab, PINFRA/22209/2016), POR Lisboa and POR Norte (Social Sciences DataLab, PIN-FRA/22209/2016). Accepted by Bill McEvily
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Over the past three decades, research on entrepreneurial pitching has grown significantly, with an increasing number of scholars in management, entrepreneurship, and other social science disciplines studying the communication and decision-making processes that surround a pitch. Despite the considerable progress made, research remains scattered across different literatures with little integration so far to explain the pitching process, its key determinants and mechanisms, and its effects. To address this lack of integration, we reviewed 252 papers published on entrepreneurial pitching since 1986, synthesizing the work to date. We found the existing literature bifurcated across two distinct vantage points—one that conceptualizes pitching as driven by the entrepreneur, and the other as primarily shaped by the actions and decisions of the investor. This focus on different actors as causal agents has led pitching scholarship to become largely restricted to one-sided studies and to a proliferation of separate theories focused on isolated processes and effects. As a result, the broader communicative process of pitching, and the mechanisms through which it is constituted, remains undertheorized and underexamined. To aid future research, we integrate existing research into a comprehensive communicative framework and elaborate on the implications of this framework for future research. We conclude the paper by discussing the ways in which theory and research on pitching can better inform pedagogy and practice.
AB - Over the past three decades, research on entrepreneurial pitching has grown significantly, with an increasing number of scholars in management, entrepreneurship, and other social science disciplines studying the communication and decision-making processes that surround a pitch. Despite the considerable progress made, research remains scattered across different literatures with little integration so far to explain the pitching process, its key determinants and mechanisms, and its effects. To address this lack of integration, we reviewed 252 papers published on entrepreneurial pitching since 1986, synthesizing the work to date. We found the existing literature bifurcated across two distinct vantage points—one that conceptualizes pitching as driven by the entrepreneur, and the other as primarily shaped by the actions and decisions of the investor. This focus on different actors as causal agents has led pitching scholarship to become largely restricted to one-sided studies and to a proliferation of separate theories focused on isolated processes and effects. As a result, the broader communicative process of pitching, and the mechanisms through which it is constituted, remains undertheorized and underexamined. To aid future research, we integrate existing research into a comprehensive communicative framework and elaborate on the implications of this framework for future research. We conclude the paper by discussing the ways in which theory and research on pitching can better inform pedagogy and practice.
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=nova_api&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001288671500006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.5465/annals.2022.0066
DO - 10.5465/annals.2022.0066
M3 - Review article
SN - 1941-6520
VL - 18
SP - 550
EP - 599
JO - Academy of Management Annals
JF - Academy of Management Annals
IS - 2
ER -