Energy flexible buildings: an evaluation of definitions and quantification methodologies applied to thermal storage

Glenn Reynders, Rui Amaral Lopes, Anna Marszal-Pomianowska, Daniel Aelenei, João Martins, Dirk Saelens

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As demand response and energy flexibility are often suggested as key principles to facilitate high levels of renewable energy sources into energy markets, different studies evaluated the potential impact of energy flexibility in buildings. Nonetheless, due to differences in definition and quantification methodologies for energy flexibility, comparing results between such studies is difficult. With a review and applied evaluation of existing definitions and quantification methodologies this paper aims at assessing the applicability, benefits and drawbacks of each quantification methodology. The conducted review shows that energy flexibility definitions found in the literature have their particularities despite sharing the same principle that energy flexibility is the ability to adapt the energy profile without jeopardizing technical and comfort constraints. The survey of quantification methodologies reveals two main approaches to quantify energy flexibility. A first approach quantifies energy flexibility indirectly using past data and assuming a specific energy system and/or energy market context. The second approach directly predicts the energy flexibility that a building can offer to the energy system in a bottom-up manner. While applications for both approaches were identified, this paper focuses on the latter. By applying methodologies that follow this second approach to a common case study, three common properties of energy flexibility were observed: i) the temporal flexibility; ii) the amplitude of power modulation; iii) and the associated cost.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)372-390
Number of pages19
JournalEnergy and Buildings
Volume166
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Fingerprint

Modulation
Costs
Hot Temperature

Keywords

  • Demand response
  • Demand side management
  • Energy flexible buildings
  • Load control
  • Smart grid

Cite this

@article{9330134d60d64ea38b59d9d04e578547,
title = "Energy flexible buildings: an evaluation of definitions and quantification methodologies applied to thermal storage",
abstract = "As demand response and energy flexibility are often suggested as key principles to facilitate high levels of renewable energy sources into energy markets, different studies evaluated the potential impact of energy flexibility in buildings. Nonetheless, due to differences in definition and quantification methodologies for energy flexibility, comparing results between such studies is difficult. With a review and applied evaluation of existing definitions and quantification methodologies this paper aims at assessing the applicability, benefits and drawbacks of each quantification methodology. The conducted review shows that energy flexibility definitions found in the literature have their particularities despite sharing the same principle that energy flexibility is the ability to adapt the energy profile without jeopardizing technical and comfort constraints. The survey of quantification methodologies reveals two main approaches to quantify energy flexibility. A first approach quantifies energy flexibility indirectly using past data and assuming a specific energy system and/or energy market context. The second approach directly predicts the energy flexibility that a building can offer to the energy system in a bottom-up manner. While applications for both approaches were identified, this paper focuses on the latter. By applying methodologies that follow this second approach to a common case study, three common properties of energy flexibility were observed: i) the temporal flexibility; ii) the amplitude of power modulation; iii) and the associated cost.",
keywords = "Demand response, Demand side management, Energy flexible buildings, Load control, Smart grid",
author = "Glenn Reynders and Lopes, {Rui Amaral} and Anna Marszal-Pomianowska and Daniel Aelenei and Jo{\~a}o Martins and Dirk Saelens",
note = "info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH{\%}2FBD{\%}2F87733{\%}2F2012/PT# Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF) (postdoc grant 0602-03003B)",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.040",
language = "English",
volume = "166",
pages = "372--390",
journal = "Energy and Buildings",
issn = "0378-7788",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.",

}

Energy flexible buildings: an evaluation of definitions and quantification methodologies applied to thermal storage. / Reynders, Glenn; Lopes, Rui Amaral ; Marszal-Pomianowska, Anna; Aelenei, Daniel; Martins, João; Saelens, Dirk.

In: Energy and Buildings, Vol. 166, 01.05.2018, p. 372-390.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy flexible buildings: an evaluation of definitions and quantification methodologies applied to thermal storage

AU - Reynders, Glenn

AU - Lopes, Rui Amaral

AU - Marszal-Pomianowska, Anna

AU - Aelenei, Daniel

AU - Martins, João

AU - Saelens, Dirk

N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBD%2F87733%2F2012/PT# Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF) (postdoc grant 0602-03003B)

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - As demand response and energy flexibility are often suggested as key principles to facilitate high levels of renewable energy sources into energy markets, different studies evaluated the potential impact of energy flexibility in buildings. Nonetheless, due to differences in definition and quantification methodologies for energy flexibility, comparing results between such studies is difficult. With a review and applied evaluation of existing definitions and quantification methodologies this paper aims at assessing the applicability, benefits and drawbacks of each quantification methodology. The conducted review shows that energy flexibility definitions found in the literature have their particularities despite sharing the same principle that energy flexibility is the ability to adapt the energy profile without jeopardizing technical and comfort constraints. The survey of quantification methodologies reveals two main approaches to quantify energy flexibility. A first approach quantifies energy flexibility indirectly using past data and assuming a specific energy system and/or energy market context. The second approach directly predicts the energy flexibility that a building can offer to the energy system in a bottom-up manner. While applications for both approaches were identified, this paper focuses on the latter. By applying methodologies that follow this second approach to a common case study, three common properties of energy flexibility were observed: i) the temporal flexibility; ii) the amplitude of power modulation; iii) and the associated cost.

AB - As demand response and energy flexibility are often suggested as key principles to facilitate high levels of renewable energy sources into energy markets, different studies evaluated the potential impact of energy flexibility in buildings. Nonetheless, due to differences in definition and quantification methodologies for energy flexibility, comparing results between such studies is difficult. With a review and applied evaluation of existing definitions and quantification methodologies this paper aims at assessing the applicability, benefits and drawbacks of each quantification methodology. The conducted review shows that energy flexibility definitions found in the literature have their particularities despite sharing the same principle that energy flexibility is the ability to adapt the energy profile without jeopardizing technical and comfort constraints. The survey of quantification methodologies reveals two main approaches to quantify energy flexibility. A first approach quantifies energy flexibility indirectly using past data and assuming a specific energy system and/or energy market context. The second approach directly predicts the energy flexibility that a building can offer to the energy system in a bottom-up manner. While applications for both approaches were identified, this paper focuses on the latter. By applying methodologies that follow this second approach to a common case study, three common properties of energy flexibility were observed: i) the temporal flexibility; ii) the amplitude of power modulation; iii) and the associated cost.

KW - Demand response

KW - Demand side management

KW - Energy flexible buildings

KW - Load control

KW - Smart grid

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042448190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.040

DO - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.040

M3 - Review article

VL - 166

SP - 372

EP - 390

JO - Energy and Buildings

JF - Energy and Buildings

SN - 0378-7788

ER -