TY - JOUR
T1 - Employee training and firm performance
T2 - evidence from ESF grant applications
AU - Martins, Pedro S.
N1 - Funding Information#
the QMUL Seedcorn Fund for financial support#
the "Human Potential" Operational Programme (POPH)#
the Ministry of the Economy and Employment#
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - As work changes, firm-provided training may be particularly relevant. However, there is little causal evidence about the effects of training on firms. This paper studies a large training grants programme supported by the European Social Fund, contrasting firms in Portugal that received the grants and others that also applied but were unsuccessful. Combining several rich data sets, we compare a large number of potential outcomes of these firms, while following them over several years both before and after the grant decision. Our difference-in-differences models estimate significant positive effects on take up (training hours and expenditure), with limited deadweight; and that such additional training led to increased sales, value added, employment, productivity, and exports. These effects tend to be of at least 5% and, in some cases, 10% or more, and are robust in multiple dimensions.
AB - As work changes, firm-provided training may be particularly relevant. However, there is little causal evidence about the effects of training on firms. This paper studies a large training grants programme supported by the European Social Fund, contrasting firms in Portugal that received the grants and others that also applied but were unsuccessful. Combining several rich data sets, we compare a large number of potential outcomes of these firms, while following them over several years both before and after the grant decision. Our difference-in-differences models estimate significant positive effects on take up (training hours and expenditure), with limited deadweight; and that such additional training led to increased sales, value added, employment, productivity, and exports. These effects tend to be of at least 5% and, in some cases, 10% or more, and are robust in multiple dimensions.
KW - Productivity
KW - Programme evaluation
KW - Training subsidies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114807056&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.labeco.2021.102056
DO - 10.1016/j.labeco.2021.102056
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114807056
SN - 0927-5371
VL - 72
JO - Labour Economics
JF - Labour Economics
M1 - 102056
ER -