Doctrinal Methodology in EU Administrative Law: Confronting the Touch of Stateness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

From its inception, the academic study of EU administrative law has relied heavily on doctrinal categories, such as concepts and principles, borrowed from the administrative law of the Member States. It has largely preferred research agendas such as the Europeanisation of national administrative law, and the development of common principles derived from national administrative laws. Legal doctrine has also engaged in the critique of EU administrative law when it fails to account for the normative standards that national administrative law must usually observe. Whereas all these constitute important research agendas, they reproduce in particularly acute terms a familiar paradox. While the existence of a European administration and administrative law beyond the state cannot be seriously disputed today, legal doctrine tends to consider them, implicitly or explicitly, from the perspective of the administrative law of the nation state. The so-called 'touch of stateness' has had a firm grip on EU administrative law, even though it includes unique aspects that lack any precedent in national laws. The article considers, and proposes a methodological approach to address, the ways in which preconceptions and normative expectations originating in national law have conditioned, and indeed prevented, the deeper doctrinal development of EU administrative law.
Original languageEnglish
JournalGerman Law Journal
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • EU Administrative Law
  • Legal Doctrine
  • Methodology
  • European Polity Paradox
  • Interdisciplinarity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Doctrinal Methodology in EU Administrative Law: Confronting the Touch of Stateness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this