Disentangling a False Dichotomy

Politics, History, and the Stakes of Universality

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

Abstract

One might start by acknowledging that the praise of particularity (and difference) has long gained the upper hand over the privilege of universality in the ideological landscape of late capitalism (which in a way amounts to say, as Agamben has recently reemphasized, that controlling disorder, rather than preventing it, has become the most important operation of present-day biopower). By the same token, it also means that the political valences of universalism might be reappraised today under a new light, in which case Europe’s philosophical legacy – whose universalism has been dismissed on account of its implicit complicity with political totalitarianism – might be given a chance to reinvent itself not in spite but thanks to its universalist trait. Against the backdrop of multiculturalism’s failure – so argues, for instance, Zizek – Europe’s universal project would give us the opportunity to rethink common issues, problems and struggles, rather than simply – and often in merely a formal fashion – to respect others. Europe’s recent history, however, seems to prevent the promotion of Europe to anything but an example – “Auschwitz”, “Stalin”, “Hiroshima” being three names under which the failure of Western modernity’s emancipatory project could be grasped. The question thus arises whether one is bound to minimize the memory of such events in order to reaffirm a politico-philosophical universalism as it were in the face of the blackmail of history… Against this assumption, which entails a false dichotomy between political universalism and historical awareness, I will argue that both the dismissal of history (for the sake of politics) and the deflection of politics (for the sake of history) should, and can, be avoided for different though compatible reasons. Alternatively, according to my proposal – which I intend to discuss in dialogue with Adorno, Agamben, Badiou, Zizek among others – the proposal of an anti-totalitarian philosophical universalism would go hand in hand with the formulation of a historically informed politics.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2014
EventXIV Conference “Images of Europe: Past, Present, Future” - Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
Duration: 4 Aug 20148 Aug 2014

Conference

ConferenceXIV Conference “Images of Europe: Past, Present, Future”
CountryPortugal
CityPorto
Period4/08/148/08/14

Fingerprint

Universality
History
Dichotomy
Universalism
Giorgio Agamben
Slavoj Žižek
Privilege
Complicity
Valence
Deflection
Biopower
Totalitarianism
Capitalism
Totalitarian
Particularity
Hiroshima
Auschwitz
Universalist
Names
Stalin

Keywords

  • dicotomia
  • política
  • história
  • universalidade

Cite this

Cachopo, J. P. D. B. G. (2014). Disentangling a False Dichotomy: Politics, History, and the Stakes of Universality. Abstract from XIV Conference “Images of Europe: Past, Present, Future”, Porto, Portugal.
Cachopo, João Pedro de Bastos Gonçalves. / Disentangling a False Dichotomy : Politics, History, and the Stakes of Universality. Abstract from XIV Conference “Images of Europe: Past, Present, Future”, Porto, Portugal.1 p.
@conference{2eb207049b384b378360dbb03e662c1e,
title = "Disentangling a False Dichotomy: Politics, History, and the Stakes of Universality",
abstract = "One might start by acknowledging that the praise of particularity (and difference) has long gained the upper hand over the privilege of universality in the ideological landscape of late capitalism (which in a way amounts to say, as Agamben has recently reemphasized, that controlling disorder, rather than preventing it, has become the most important operation of present-day biopower). By the same token, it also means that the political valences of universalism might be reappraised today under a new light, in which case Europe’s philosophical legacy – whose universalism has been dismissed on account of its implicit complicity with political totalitarianism – might be given a chance to reinvent itself not in spite but thanks to its universalist trait. Against the backdrop of multiculturalism’s failure – so argues, for instance, Zizek – Europe’s universal project would give us the opportunity to rethink common issues, problems and struggles, rather than simply – and often in merely a formal fashion – to respect others. Europe’s recent history, however, seems to prevent the promotion of Europe to anything but an example – “Auschwitz”, “Stalin”, “Hiroshima” being three names under which the failure of Western modernity’s emancipatory project could be grasped. The question thus arises whether one is bound to minimize the memory of such events in order to reaffirm a politico-philosophical universalism as it were in the face of the blackmail of history… Against this assumption, which entails a false dichotomy between political universalism and historical awareness, I will argue that both the dismissal of history (for the sake of politics) and the deflection of politics (for the sake of history) should, and can, be avoided for different though compatible reasons. Alternatively, according to my proposal – which I intend to discuss in dialogue with Adorno, Agamben, Badiou, Zizek among others – the proposal of an anti-totalitarian philosophical universalism would go hand in hand with the formulation of a historically informed politics.",
keywords = "dicotomia, pol{\'i}tica, hist{\'o}ria, universalidade",
author = "Cachopo, {Jo{\~a}o Pedro de Bastos Gon{\cc}alves}",
note = "info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/136075/PT# info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH{\%}2FBPD{\%}2F79759{\%}2F2011/PT# PEst-OE/EAT/UI0693/2014 SFRH/BPD/79759/2011; XIV Conference “Images of Europe: Past, Present, Future” ; Conference date: 04-08-2014 Through 08-08-2014",
year = "2014",
language = "English",

}

Cachopo, JPDBG 2014, 'Disentangling a False Dichotomy: Politics, History, and the Stakes of Universality' XIV Conference “Images of Europe: Past, Present, Future”, Porto, Portugal, 4/08/14 - 8/08/14, .

Disentangling a False Dichotomy : Politics, History, and the Stakes of Universality. / Cachopo, João Pedro de Bastos Gonçalves.

2014. Abstract from XIV Conference “Images of Europe: Past, Present, Future”, Porto, Portugal.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

TY - CONF

T1 - Disentangling a False Dichotomy

T2 - Politics, History, and the Stakes of Universality

AU - Cachopo, João Pedro de Bastos Gonçalves

N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/136075/PT# info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBPD%2F79759%2F2011/PT# PEst-OE/EAT/UI0693/2014 SFRH/BPD/79759/2011

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - One might start by acknowledging that the praise of particularity (and difference) has long gained the upper hand over the privilege of universality in the ideological landscape of late capitalism (which in a way amounts to say, as Agamben has recently reemphasized, that controlling disorder, rather than preventing it, has become the most important operation of present-day biopower). By the same token, it also means that the political valences of universalism might be reappraised today under a new light, in which case Europe’s philosophical legacy – whose universalism has been dismissed on account of its implicit complicity with political totalitarianism – might be given a chance to reinvent itself not in spite but thanks to its universalist trait. Against the backdrop of multiculturalism’s failure – so argues, for instance, Zizek – Europe’s universal project would give us the opportunity to rethink common issues, problems and struggles, rather than simply – and often in merely a formal fashion – to respect others. Europe’s recent history, however, seems to prevent the promotion of Europe to anything but an example – “Auschwitz”, “Stalin”, “Hiroshima” being three names under which the failure of Western modernity’s emancipatory project could be grasped. The question thus arises whether one is bound to minimize the memory of such events in order to reaffirm a politico-philosophical universalism as it were in the face of the blackmail of history… Against this assumption, which entails a false dichotomy between political universalism and historical awareness, I will argue that both the dismissal of history (for the sake of politics) and the deflection of politics (for the sake of history) should, and can, be avoided for different though compatible reasons. Alternatively, according to my proposal – which I intend to discuss in dialogue with Adorno, Agamben, Badiou, Zizek among others – the proposal of an anti-totalitarian philosophical universalism would go hand in hand with the formulation of a historically informed politics.

AB - One might start by acknowledging that the praise of particularity (and difference) has long gained the upper hand over the privilege of universality in the ideological landscape of late capitalism (which in a way amounts to say, as Agamben has recently reemphasized, that controlling disorder, rather than preventing it, has become the most important operation of present-day biopower). By the same token, it also means that the political valences of universalism might be reappraised today under a new light, in which case Europe’s philosophical legacy – whose universalism has been dismissed on account of its implicit complicity with political totalitarianism – might be given a chance to reinvent itself not in spite but thanks to its universalist trait. Against the backdrop of multiculturalism’s failure – so argues, for instance, Zizek – Europe’s universal project would give us the opportunity to rethink common issues, problems and struggles, rather than simply – and often in merely a formal fashion – to respect others. Europe’s recent history, however, seems to prevent the promotion of Europe to anything but an example – “Auschwitz”, “Stalin”, “Hiroshima” being three names under which the failure of Western modernity’s emancipatory project could be grasped. The question thus arises whether one is bound to minimize the memory of such events in order to reaffirm a politico-philosophical universalism as it were in the face of the blackmail of history… Against this assumption, which entails a false dichotomy between political universalism and historical awareness, I will argue that both the dismissal of history (for the sake of politics) and the deflection of politics (for the sake of history) should, and can, be avoided for different though compatible reasons. Alternatively, according to my proposal – which I intend to discuss in dialogue with Adorno, Agamben, Badiou, Zizek among others – the proposal of an anti-totalitarian philosophical universalism would go hand in hand with the formulation of a historically informed politics.

KW - dicotomia

KW - política

KW - história

KW - universalidade

M3 - Abstract

ER -

Cachopo JPDBG. Disentangling a False Dichotomy: Politics, History, and the Stakes of Universality. 2014. Abstract from XIV Conference “Images of Europe: Past, Present, Future”, Porto, Portugal.