TY - JOUR
T1 - Diabetes-related antibody-testing is a valuable screening tool for identifying monogenic diabetes – A survey from the worldwide SWEET registry
AU - Limbert, Catarina
AU - Lanzinger, Stefanie
AU - deBeaufort, Carine
AU - Iotova, Violeta
AU - Pelicand, Julie
AU - Prieto, Mariana
AU - Schiaffini, Riccardo
AU - Šumnik, Zdeněk
AU - Pacaud, Danièle
N1 - Funding Information:
SWEET is a registered non-profit charity in Hannover, Germany. It is financed through membership fees of the participating centres (based on income of country of residence according to the World Bank) and corporate members. We acknowledge with gratitude the support from the following SWEET e.V. corporate members – in alphabetical order: Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, DexCom Inc. Insulet, Eli Lilly & Co. Medtronic Europe, Sanofi.
Funding Information:
SWEET is a registered non-profit charity in Hannover, Germany. It is financed through membership fees of the participating centres (based on income of country of residence according to the World Bank) and corporate members. We acknowledge with gratitude the support from the following SWEET e.V. corporate members – in alphabetical order: Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, DexCom Inc., Insulet, Eli Lilly & Co., Medtronic Europe, Sanofi.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Aims: To evaluate access to screening tools for monogenic diabetes in paediatric diabetes centres across the world and its impact on diagnosis and clinical outcomes of children and youth with genetic forms of diabetes. Methods: 79 centres from the SWEET diabetes registry including 53,207 children with diabetes participated in a survey on accessibility and use of diabetes related antibodies, c-peptide and genetic testing. Results: 73, 63 and 62 participating centres had access to c-peptide, antibody and genetic testing, respectively. Access to antibody testing was associated with higher proportion of patients with rare forms of diabetes identified with monogenic diabetes (54 % versus 17 %, p = 0.01), lower average whole clinic HbA1c (7.7[Q1,Q2: 7.3–8.0]%/61[56–64]mmol/mol versus 9.2[8.6–10.0]%/77[70–86]mmol/mol, p < 0.001) and younger age at onset (8.3 [7.3–8.8] versus 9.7 [8.6–12.7] years p < 0.001). Additional access to c-peptide or genetic testing was not related to differences in age at onset or HbA1c outcome. Conclusions: Clinical suspicion and antibody testing are related to identification of different types of diabetes. Implementing access to comprehensive antibody screening may provide important information for selecting individuals for further genetic evaluation. In addition, worse overall clinical outcomes in centers with limited diagnostic capabilities indicate they may also need support for individualized diabetes management. Trial Registration: NCT04427189.
AB - Aims: To evaluate access to screening tools for monogenic diabetes in paediatric diabetes centres across the world and its impact on diagnosis and clinical outcomes of children and youth with genetic forms of diabetes. Methods: 79 centres from the SWEET diabetes registry including 53,207 children with diabetes participated in a survey on accessibility and use of diabetes related antibodies, c-peptide and genetic testing. Results: 73, 63 and 62 participating centres had access to c-peptide, antibody and genetic testing, respectively. Access to antibody testing was associated with higher proportion of patients with rare forms of diabetes identified with monogenic diabetes (54 % versus 17 %, p = 0.01), lower average whole clinic HbA1c (7.7[Q1,Q2: 7.3–8.0]%/61[56–64]mmol/mol versus 9.2[8.6–10.0]%/77[70–86]mmol/mol, p < 0.001) and younger age at onset (8.3 [7.3–8.8] versus 9.7 [8.6–12.7] years p < 0.001). Additional access to c-peptide or genetic testing was not related to differences in age at onset or HbA1c outcome. Conclusions: Clinical suspicion and antibody testing are related to identification of different types of diabetes. Implementing access to comprehensive antibody screening may provide important information for selecting individuals for further genetic evaluation. In addition, worse overall clinical outcomes in centers with limited diagnostic capabilities indicate they may also need support for individualized diabetes management. Trial Registration: NCT04427189.
KW - Diabetes
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Monogenic
KW - Paediatric
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140030177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110110
DO - 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110110
M3 - Article
C2 - 36183869
AN - SCOPUS:85140030177
SN - 0168-8227
VL - 192
JO - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
JF - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
M1 - 110110
ER -