Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics

Integrating the "big 3" of technology acceptance with privacy context

Caroline Lancelot Miltgen, Aleš Popovič, Tiago Oliveira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The information systems (IS) literature has long emphasized the importance of user acceptance of computer-based IS. Evaluating the determinants of acceptance of information technology (IT) is vital to address the problem of underutilization and leverage the benefits of IT investments, especially for more radical technologies. This study examines individual acceptance of biometric identification techniques in a voluntary environment, measuring the intention to accept and further recommend the technology resulting from a carefully selected set of variables. Drawing on elements of technology acceptance model (TAM), diffusion of innovations (DOI) and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) along with the trust-privacy research field, we propose an integrated approach that is both theoretically and empirically grounded. By testing some of the most relevant and well-tested elements from previous models along with new antecedents to biometric system adoption, this study produces results which are both sturdy and innovative. We first confirm the influence of renowned technology acceptance variables such as compatibility, perceived usefulness, facilitating conditions on biometrics systems acceptance and further recommendation. Second, prior factors such as concern for privacy, trust in the technology, and innovativeness also prove to have an influence. Third, unless innovativeness, the most important drivers to explain biometrics acceptance and recommendation are not from the traditional adoption models (TAM, DOI, and UTAUT) but from the trust and privacy literature (trust in technology and perceived risk).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-114
Number of pages12
JournalDecision Support Systems
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Privacy
Biometrics
Technology
Diffusion of Innovation
Information technology
Information systems
Information Systems
Innovation
Biometric Identification
Technology acceptance
User acceptance
End users
Acceptance
End Users
Testing

Keywords

  • Biometric system
  • Personal data
  • Privacy
  • Risk
  • Technology acceptance
  • Trust

Cite this

@article{47340fec5d5d457690c267e1d4a019a3,
title = "Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: Integrating the {"}big 3{"} of technology acceptance with privacy context",
abstract = "The information systems (IS) literature has long emphasized the importance of user acceptance of computer-based IS. Evaluating the determinants of acceptance of information technology (IT) is vital to address the problem of underutilization and leverage the benefits of IT investments, especially for more radical technologies. This study examines individual acceptance of biometric identification techniques in a voluntary environment, measuring the intention to accept and further recommend the technology resulting from a carefully selected set of variables. Drawing on elements of technology acceptance model (TAM), diffusion of innovations (DOI) and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) along with the trust-privacy research field, we propose an integrated approach that is both theoretically and empirically grounded. By testing some of the most relevant and well-tested elements from previous models along with new antecedents to biometric system adoption, this study produces results which are both sturdy and innovative. We first confirm the influence of renowned technology acceptance variables such as compatibility, perceived usefulness, facilitating conditions on biometrics systems acceptance and further recommendation. Second, prior factors such as concern for privacy, trust in the technology, and innovativeness also prove to have an influence. Third, unless innovativeness, the most important drivers to explain biometrics acceptance and recommendation are not from the traditional adoption models (TAM, DOI, and UTAUT) but from the trust and privacy literature (trust in technology and perceived risk).",
keywords = "Biometric system, Personal data, Privacy, Risk, Technology acceptance, Trust",
author = "{Lancelot Miltgen}, Caroline and Aleš Popovič and Tiago Oliveira",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "103--114",
journal = "Decision Support Systems",
issn = "0167-9236",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.",
number = "1",

}

Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics : Integrating the "big 3" of technology acceptance with privacy context. / Lancelot Miltgen, Caroline; Popovič, Aleš; Oliveira, Tiago.

In: Decision Support Systems, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.12.2013, p. 103-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics

T2 - Integrating the "big 3" of technology acceptance with privacy context

AU - Lancelot Miltgen, Caroline

AU - Popovič, Aleš

AU - Oliveira, Tiago

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - The information systems (IS) literature has long emphasized the importance of user acceptance of computer-based IS. Evaluating the determinants of acceptance of information technology (IT) is vital to address the problem of underutilization and leverage the benefits of IT investments, especially for more radical technologies. This study examines individual acceptance of biometric identification techniques in a voluntary environment, measuring the intention to accept and further recommend the technology resulting from a carefully selected set of variables. Drawing on elements of technology acceptance model (TAM), diffusion of innovations (DOI) and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) along with the trust-privacy research field, we propose an integrated approach that is both theoretically and empirically grounded. By testing some of the most relevant and well-tested elements from previous models along with new antecedents to biometric system adoption, this study produces results which are both sturdy and innovative. We first confirm the influence of renowned technology acceptance variables such as compatibility, perceived usefulness, facilitating conditions on biometrics systems acceptance and further recommendation. Second, prior factors such as concern for privacy, trust in the technology, and innovativeness also prove to have an influence. Third, unless innovativeness, the most important drivers to explain biometrics acceptance and recommendation are not from the traditional adoption models (TAM, DOI, and UTAUT) but from the trust and privacy literature (trust in technology and perceived risk).

AB - The information systems (IS) literature has long emphasized the importance of user acceptance of computer-based IS. Evaluating the determinants of acceptance of information technology (IT) is vital to address the problem of underutilization and leverage the benefits of IT investments, especially for more radical technologies. This study examines individual acceptance of biometric identification techniques in a voluntary environment, measuring the intention to accept and further recommend the technology resulting from a carefully selected set of variables. Drawing on elements of technology acceptance model (TAM), diffusion of innovations (DOI) and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) along with the trust-privacy research field, we propose an integrated approach that is both theoretically and empirically grounded. By testing some of the most relevant and well-tested elements from previous models along with new antecedents to biometric system adoption, this study produces results which are both sturdy and innovative. We first confirm the influence of renowned technology acceptance variables such as compatibility, perceived usefulness, facilitating conditions on biometrics systems acceptance and further recommendation. Second, prior factors such as concern for privacy, trust in the technology, and innovativeness also prove to have an influence. Third, unless innovativeness, the most important drivers to explain biometrics acceptance and recommendation are not from the traditional adoption models (TAM, DOI, and UTAUT) but from the trust and privacy literature (trust in technology and perceived risk).

KW - Biometric system

KW - Personal data

KW - Privacy

KW - Risk

KW - Technology acceptance

KW - Trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889086951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010

DO - 10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 103

EP - 114

JO - Decision Support Systems

JF - Decision Support Systems

SN - 0167-9236

IS - 1

ER -