TY - JOUR
T1 - Defying standard criteria for digital replantation
T2 - A case series
AU - Casal, Diogo
AU - Gomez, Manuel Mac Emino
AU - Antunes, Paula
AU - Candeias, Henrique
AU - Almeida, Maria Angélica
N1 - Funding Information:
Diogo Casal (the first author of the paper) received a grant from “The Programme for Advanced Medical Education” sponsored by “ Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Fundação Champalimaud, Ministério da Saúde and Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal .”
Funding Information:
Part of this work was funded by “The Programme for Advanced Medical Education” sponsored by “Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Fundação Champalimaud, Ministério da Saúde and Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal.”
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - INTRODUCTION There is much controversy regarding the current indications and contraindications for digital replantation. PRESENTATION OF CASE Three patients with absolute contraindications for digital replantation according to classical criteria are presented (Case 1: multilevel amputation of the hand and fingers; Case 3: avulsion of the thumb; Case 4: index amputation proximal to the insertion of the flexor digitorum superficialis). In addition a patient with a very distal digital amputation (Case 2), whose indication for replantation is controversial is also presented. In all cases, the patients were replanted and showed good functional and aesthetical results. DISCUSSION Most authors advocate that the classical indications for replantation have been validated by experience, are predicated on the potential for long-term function, and should be followed in most if not all cases. However, some surgeons have been adopting a more liberal attitude with good results. CONCLUSION The clinical cases presented in this paper suggest that the standard criteria for digital replantation should not be followed rigidly but instead should be regarded as a general guide.
AB - INTRODUCTION There is much controversy regarding the current indications and contraindications for digital replantation. PRESENTATION OF CASE Three patients with absolute contraindications for digital replantation according to classical criteria are presented (Case 1: multilevel amputation of the hand and fingers; Case 3: avulsion of the thumb; Case 4: index amputation proximal to the insertion of the flexor digitorum superficialis). In addition a patient with a very distal digital amputation (Case 2), whose indication for replantation is controversial is also presented. In all cases, the patients were replanted and showed good functional and aesthetical results. DISCUSSION Most authors advocate that the classical indications for replantation have been validated by experience, are predicated on the potential for long-term function, and should be followed in most if not all cases. However, some surgeons have been adopting a more liberal attitude with good results. CONCLUSION The clinical cases presented in this paper suggest that the standard criteria for digital replantation should not be followed rigidly but instead should be regarded as a general guide.
KW - Amputation
KW - Finger injuries/surgery
KW - Fingers/surgery
KW - Graft survival
KW - Humans
KW - Outcome assessment (health care)
KW - Replantation/contraindications/methods
KW - Traumatic/classification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877942777&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijscr.2013.03.033
DO - 10.1016/j.ijscr.2013.03.033
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84877942777
SN - 2210-2612
VL - 4
SP - 597
EP - 602
JO - International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
JF - International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
IS - 7
ER -