Dealing with temporariness

Generational effects on temporary agency workers’ employment relationships

Filipa Sobral, Eddy S. Ng, Filipa Castanheira, Maria José Chambel, Bas Koene

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: A major trend in the changing nature of work is the increasing use of temporary workers. Although common among students, older employees have joined the ranks of temporary workers as they extend their work lives. Temporary workers tend to report lower affective commitment and consequently poorer work outcomes. However, different generations of workers may conceive temporary work differently from each other. The purpose of this paper is to explore how different generations of temporary workers, respond to human resource practices (HRP), which in turn influences their affective commitment and work performance. Design/methodology/approach: The sample is comprised of 3,876 temporary agency workers (TAWs) from seven temporary employment agencies in Portugal. The authors undertook multiple group SEM analyses to test a moderated mediation model that accounts for TAWs’ affective commitment (toward the agency and the client company) across three generations (Baby Boomers, Generation X and Millennials) in the relationship between human resources practices and overall perceived performance. Findings: After controlling for gender, age and tenure, the authors find generational differences in the perceptions of HRP and perceived performance. The results support the moderator effect of generations in the direct and indirect relationships – through both affective commitments – between TAWs’ perceived HRP and perceived performance. Research limitations/implications: The cross-sectional design limits the possibility to make causal inferences. Originality/value: This study contributes to a better understanding of how different generations respond to temporary employment relationships. The findings suggest important differences in the way in which the same HRP system relates (directly and indirectly thorough affective commitment toward the client) with their perceived performance across different generations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)406-424
JournalPersonnel Review
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Cohort Effect
Portugal
Workers
Students
Affective commitment
Human resource practices
Research
Temporary workers
Temporary employment
Work Performance
Temporary work
Design methodology
Moderator effects
Millennials
Tenure
Work performance
Work outcomes
Generational differences
Causal inference
Mediation

Keywords

  • Generational differences
  • Generations
  • Human resource practices
  • Quantitative
  • Social exchange
  • Temporary/contingent workers

Cite this

Sobral, Filipa ; Ng, Eddy S. ; Castanheira, Filipa ; Chambel, Maria José ; Koene, Bas. / Dealing with temporariness : Generational effects on temporary agency workers’ employment relationships. In: Personnel Review. 2020 ; Vol. 49, No. 2. pp. 406-424.
@article{62207752bb48452da4a59d72fa7e8edf,
title = "Dealing with temporariness: Generational effects on temporary agency workers’ employment relationships",
abstract = "Purpose: A major trend in the changing nature of work is the increasing use of temporary workers. Although common among students, older employees have joined the ranks of temporary workers as they extend their work lives. Temporary workers tend to report lower affective commitment and consequently poorer work outcomes. However, different generations of workers may conceive temporary work differently from each other. The purpose of this paper is to explore how different generations of temporary workers, respond to human resource practices (HRP), which in turn influences their affective commitment and work performance. Design/methodology/approach: The sample is comprised of 3,876 temporary agency workers (TAWs) from seven temporary employment agencies in Portugal. The authors undertook multiple group SEM analyses to test a moderated mediation model that accounts for TAWs’ affective commitment (toward the agency and the client company) across three generations (Baby Boomers, Generation X and Millennials) in the relationship between human resources practices and overall perceived performance. Findings: After controlling for gender, age and tenure, the authors find generational differences in the perceptions of HRP and perceived performance. The results support the moderator effect of generations in the direct and indirect relationships – through both affective commitments – between TAWs’ perceived HRP and perceived performance. Research limitations/implications: The cross-sectional design limits the possibility to make causal inferences. Originality/value: This study contributes to a better understanding of how different generations respond to temporary employment relationships. The findings suggest important differences in the way in which the same HRP system relates (directly and indirectly thorough affective commitment toward the client) with their perceived performance across different generations.",
keywords = "Generational differences, Generations, Human resource practices, Quantitative, Social exchange, Temporary/contingent workers",
author = "Filipa Sobral and Ng, {Eddy S.} and Filipa Castanheira and Chambel, {Maria Jos{\'e}} and Bas Koene",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1108/PR-02-2018-0071",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "406--424",
journal = "Personnel Review",
issn = "0048-3486",
number = "2",

}

Dealing with temporariness : Generational effects on temporary agency workers’ employment relationships. / Sobral, Filipa; Ng, Eddy S.; Castanheira, Filipa; Chambel, Maria José; Koene, Bas.

In: Personnel Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2020, p. 406-424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dealing with temporariness

T2 - Generational effects on temporary agency workers’ employment relationships

AU - Sobral, Filipa

AU - Ng, Eddy S.

AU - Castanheira, Filipa

AU - Chambel, Maria José

AU - Koene, Bas

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Purpose: A major trend in the changing nature of work is the increasing use of temporary workers. Although common among students, older employees have joined the ranks of temporary workers as they extend their work lives. Temporary workers tend to report lower affective commitment and consequently poorer work outcomes. However, different generations of workers may conceive temporary work differently from each other. The purpose of this paper is to explore how different generations of temporary workers, respond to human resource practices (HRP), which in turn influences their affective commitment and work performance. Design/methodology/approach: The sample is comprised of 3,876 temporary agency workers (TAWs) from seven temporary employment agencies in Portugal. The authors undertook multiple group SEM analyses to test a moderated mediation model that accounts for TAWs’ affective commitment (toward the agency and the client company) across three generations (Baby Boomers, Generation X and Millennials) in the relationship between human resources practices and overall perceived performance. Findings: After controlling for gender, age and tenure, the authors find generational differences in the perceptions of HRP and perceived performance. The results support the moderator effect of generations in the direct and indirect relationships – through both affective commitments – between TAWs’ perceived HRP and perceived performance. Research limitations/implications: The cross-sectional design limits the possibility to make causal inferences. Originality/value: This study contributes to a better understanding of how different generations respond to temporary employment relationships. The findings suggest important differences in the way in which the same HRP system relates (directly and indirectly thorough affective commitment toward the client) with their perceived performance across different generations.

AB - Purpose: A major trend in the changing nature of work is the increasing use of temporary workers. Although common among students, older employees have joined the ranks of temporary workers as they extend their work lives. Temporary workers tend to report lower affective commitment and consequently poorer work outcomes. However, different generations of workers may conceive temporary work differently from each other. The purpose of this paper is to explore how different generations of temporary workers, respond to human resource practices (HRP), which in turn influences their affective commitment and work performance. Design/methodology/approach: The sample is comprised of 3,876 temporary agency workers (TAWs) from seven temporary employment agencies in Portugal. The authors undertook multiple group SEM analyses to test a moderated mediation model that accounts for TAWs’ affective commitment (toward the agency and the client company) across three generations (Baby Boomers, Generation X and Millennials) in the relationship between human resources practices and overall perceived performance. Findings: After controlling for gender, age and tenure, the authors find generational differences in the perceptions of HRP and perceived performance. The results support the moderator effect of generations in the direct and indirect relationships – through both affective commitments – between TAWs’ perceived HRP and perceived performance. Research limitations/implications: The cross-sectional design limits the possibility to make causal inferences. Originality/value: This study contributes to a better understanding of how different generations respond to temporary employment relationships. The findings suggest important differences in the way in which the same HRP system relates (directly and indirectly thorough affective commitment toward the client) with their perceived performance across different generations.

KW - Generational differences

KW - Generations

KW - Human resource practices

KW - Quantitative

KW - Social exchange

KW - Temporary/contingent workers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075143053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/PR-02-2018-0071

DO - 10.1108/PR-02-2018-0071

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 406

EP - 424

JO - Personnel Review

JF - Personnel Review

SN - 0048-3486

IS - 2

ER -