TY - JOUR
T1 - Crop phenotyping in a context of global change
T2 - What to measure and how to do it
AU - Araus, Jose Luis
AU - Kefauver, Shawn Carlisle
AU - Vergara-Díaz, Omar
AU - Gracia-Romero, Adrian
AU - Rezzouk, Fatima Zahra
AU - Segarra, Joel
AU - Buchaillot, Maria Luisa
AU - Chang-Espino, Melissa
AU - Vatter, Thomas
AU - Sanchez-Bragado, Rut
AU - Fernandez-Gallego, José Armando
AU - Serret, Maria Dolores
AU - Bort, Jordi
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the support of the Spanish project PID2019‐ 106650RB‐C21 from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain. J.L.A. acknowledges support from the Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA) Academia, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain. T.V. acknowledges the Juan de la Cierva Postdoctoral Contract, from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain.
Funding Information:
We acknowledge the support of the Spanish project PID2019- 106650RB-C21 from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci?n, Spain. J.L.A. acknowledges support from the Instituci? Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avan?ats (ICREA) Academia, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain. T.V. acknowledges the Juan de la Cierva Postdoctoral Contract, from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci?n, Spain.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - High-throughput crop phenotyping, particularly under field conditions, is nowadays perceived as a key factor limiting crop genetic advance. Phenotyping not only facilitates conventional breeding, but it is necessary to fully exploit the capabilities of molecular breeding, and it can be exploited to predict breeding targets for the years ahead at the regional level through more advanced simulation models and decision support systems. In terms of phenotyping, it is necessary to determined which selection traits are relevant in each situation, and which phenotyping tools/methods are available to assess such traits. Remote sensing methodologies are currently the most popular approaches, even when lab-based analyses are still relevant in many circumstances. On top of that, data processing and automation, together with machine learning/deep learning are contributing to the wide range of applications for phenotyping. This review addresses spectral and red–green–blue sensing as the most popular remote sensing approaches, alongside stable isotope composition as an example of a lab-based tool, and root phenotyping, which represents one of the frontiers for field phenotyping. Further, we consider the two most promising forms of aerial platforms (unmanned aerial vehicle and satellites) and some of the emerging data-processing techniques. The review includes three Boxes that examine specific case studies.
AB - High-throughput crop phenotyping, particularly under field conditions, is nowadays perceived as a key factor limiting crop genetic advance. Phenotyping not only facilitates conventional breeding, but it is necessary to fully exploit the capabilities of molecular breeding, and it can be exploited to predict breeding targets for the years ahead at the regional level through more advanced simulation models and decision support systems. In terms of phenotyping, it is necessary to determined which selection traits are relevant in each situation, and which phenotyping tools/methods are available to assess such traits. Remote sensing methodologies are currently the most popular approaches, even when lab-based analyses are still relevant in many circumstances. On top of that, data processing and automation, together with machine learning/deep learning are contributing to the wide range of applications for phenotyping. This review addresses spectral and red–green–blue sensing as the most popular remote sensing approaches, alongside stable isotope composition as an example of a lab-based tool, and root phenotyping, which represents one of the frontiers for field phenotyping. Further, we consider the two most promising forms of aerial platforms (unmanned aerial vehicle and satellites) and some of the emerging data-processing techniques. The review includes three Boxes that examine specific case studies.
KW - crop phenotyping
KW - deep learning
KW - models
KW - photosynthesis
KW - platforms
KW - remote sensing
KW - roots
KW - satellites
KW - sensors
KW - stable isotopes
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85125551162
U2 - 10.1111/jipb.13191
DO - 10.1111/jipb.13191
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34807514
AN - SCOPUS:85125551162
SN - 1672-9072
VL - 64
SP - 592
EP - 618
JO - Journal Of Integrative Plant Biology
JF - Journal Of Integrative Plant Biology
IS - 2
ER -