TY - JOUR
T1 - Covid-19 in Central America
T2 - Firm resilience and policy responses on employment
AU - Calzada Olvera, Beatriz
AU - Gonzalez-Sauri, Mario
AU - Moya, David Alexander Harings
AU - Louvin, Federico
N1 - Funding Information:
A previous version of this study was originally under the UNU-WIDER project Transforming informal work and livelihoods and presented at the WIDER Development Conference ‘COVID-19 and development-effects and new realities for the Global South’, 6-8 September 2021).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - This paper examines how government support interacts with firm-level resilience capabilities in the reduction of layoffs among formal firms in Central America. Our analysis suggests that government support measures play a role in reducing the probability of layoffs among firms with only dynamic resilience capabilities (i.e., those that are developed after the pandemic onset). The effect of government support is not statistically different from the effect of static resilience capabilities alone (i.e., those that were present before the pandemic); thus, in firms with such capabilities, the effect of government support will be marginal. These results hold across sectors - exhibiting a marginally higher treatment effect in service sectors. Our results do not imply that Covid-19 supportive measures are to be disregarded, but instead raise the question of how government support policies could improve the allocation of support among firms in times of crises. Moreover, it underlines the necessity of policies that enhance resilience more broadly – a task that hints at structural issues and requires continuous government support in lieu of ad-hoc measures.
AB - This paper examines how government support interacts with firm-level resilience capabilities in the reduction of layoffs among formal firms in Central America. Our analysis suggests that government support measures play a role in reducing the probability of layoffs among firms with only dynamic resilience capabilities (i.e., those that are developed after the pandemic onset). The effect of government support is not statistically different from the effect of static resilience capabilities alone (i.e., those that were present before the pandemic); thus, in firms with such capabilities, the effect of government support will be marginal. These results hold across sectors - exhibiting a marginally higher treatment effect in service sectors. Our results do not imply that Covid-19 supportive measures are to be disregarded, but instead raise the question of how government support policies could improve the allocation of support among firms in times of crises. Moreover, it underlines the necessity of policies that enhance resilience more broadly – a task that hints at structural issues and requires continuous government support in lieu of ad-hoc measures.
KW - Firm capabilities
KW - Government support
KW - Innovation
KW - Resilience
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144034806&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.11.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.11.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85144034806
SN - 0161-8938
VL - 44
SP - 1280
EP - 1295
JO - Journal of Policy Modeling
JF - Journal of Policy Modeling
IS - 6
ER -