Controversias como método para anti-história

Translated title of the contribution: Controversies as method for anti-history

César Tureta, Bruno AméRico, Stewart Clegg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Our aim is to develop and propose a method for ANTi-historians, using analysis of controversy as the starting point. Despite the theoretical and methodological development of the ANTi-history approach to the study of knowledge of the past and the creation of its history, there is room for method development based on controversy analysis. We ground our proposal in some of ANTi-history’s assumptions (relationalism, the symmetry principle, and multiplicity) and practical concepts (translation and politics of actor-networks). In addition, we recommend four criteria that researchers should use in choosing a controversy to serve as a starting point for investigation. Finally, we present five steps for investigating knowledge of the past and the creation of history.

Translated title of the contributionControversies as method for anti-history
Original languagePortuguese
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalRAE Revista de Administracao de Empresas
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021

Keywords

  • actor-network theory
  • ANTi-history
  • controversies
  • historic turn
  • organizational history

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Controversies as method for anti-history'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this