Contact quotient versus closed quotient: A comparative study on professional male singers

Filipa M B Lã, Johan Sundberg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objectives The term "closed quotient" is frequently used for data derived both from inverse filtering and from electroglottography. In the former case, it is defined as the ratio between the closed phase and the period, as measured in flow glottograms (FLOGG), whereas in the latter case, it is defined as the time interval between the falling and rising parts of the electroglottogram (EGG), measured at some percentage of the peak-to-peak amplitude. The study aims at analyzing differences between EGG- and FLOGG-based closed quotients and their relationships with voice source parameters. Study Design Comparative study. Methods FLOGG- and EGG-based measures collected from five professional male singers were compared, under different pitch and loudness conditions. Results Compared with the FLOGG-based quotient, the EGG-based quotient (i) varied more between subjects, (ii) presented greater values, (iii) varied less with subglottal pressure, (iv) varied less with the normalized amplitude quotient (ie, the ratio between the flow pulse amplitude and the product of period and maximum flow declination rate), and (v) varied less with the relative amplitude of the voice source fundamental. Conclusions Although positively related, FLOGG- and EGG-based closed quotients differ and must not be confused.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)148-154
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal Of Voice
    Volume29
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2015

    Keywords

    • Closed quotient
    • Contact quotient
    • Electrolaryngography
    • Flow glottogram
    • Inverse filtering
    • Trained male voices
    • Voice source analysis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Contact quotient versus closed quotient: A comparative study on professional male singers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this