TY - JOUR
T1 - Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/mass spectrometric analysis of pepper volatiles
AU - Cardeal, Zenilda L.
AU - Silva, Marco Diogo Richter Gomes da
AU - Marriott, Philip John
PY - 2006/1/1
Y1 - 2006/1/1
N2 - The headspace compositions of 13 pepper and peppercorn samples of different species, colloquially also referred to as pepper, were analyzed, and more than 300 compounds were tentatively characterized by means of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography in tandem with flame ionization detection, quadrupole mass spectrometric detection and time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection (GC X GC-FID, GC X GC/qMS and GC X GC/TOFMS, respectively). The analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was performed after solid-phase microextraction (SPME) using a 75-mu m PDMS/DVB fibre. Fingerprint comparison between the three techniques permitted peaks to be assigned in the GC X GC-FID experiment based on the analogous MS analysis, taking into account retention shifts arising from method variations. When using GC X GC/TOFMS, about five times more peaks were identified than in GC X GC/qMS. Retention indices for all peaks were calculated in the bi-dimensional column set comprising of a 5% phenyl polysilphenylene-siloxane primary column and a polyethylene glycol second column. The spectra obtained by both mass detection techniques (qMS and TOFMS) give very similar results when spectral library searching was performed. The majority of the identified compounds eluted as pure components as a result of high-resolution GC X GC separations, which significantly reduces coelution, and therefore increases the likelihood that pure spectra can be obtained. The differences between TOFMS and qMS (in fast scanning mode) spectra were generally small. Whilst spectral quality and relative ion ratios across a narrow peak (e.g. w(b) similar to 100-150 ms) do vary more for the fast peaks obtained in GC X GC/qMS operation, than with TOFMS, in general adequate spectral matching with the library can be achieved. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
AB - The headspace compositions of 13 pepper and peppercorn samples of different species, colloquially also referred to as pepper, were analyzed, and more than 300 compounds were tentatively characterized by means of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography in tandem with flame ionization detection, quadrupole mass spectrometric detection and time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection (GC X GC-FID, GC X GC/qMS and GC X GC/TOFMS, respectively). The analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was performed after solid-phase microextraction (SPME) using a 75-mu m PDMS/DVB fibre. Fingerprint comparison between the three techniques permitted peaks to be assigned in the GC X GC-FID experiment based on the analogous MS analysis, taking into account retention shifts arising from method variations. When using GC X GC/TOFMS, about five times more peaks were identified than in GC X GC/qMS. Retention indices for all peaks were calculated in the bi-dimensional column set comprising of a 5% phenyl polysilphenylene-siloxane primary column and a polyethylene glycol second column. The spectra obtained by both mass detection techniques (qMS and TOFMS) give very similar results when spectral library searching was performed. The majority of the identified compounds eluted as pure components as a result of high-resolution GC X GC separations, which significantly reduces coelution, and therefore increases the likelihood that pure spectra can be obtained. The differences between TOFMS and qMS (in fast scanning mode) spectra were generally small. Whilst spectral quality and relative ion ratios across a narrow peak (e.g. w(b) similar to 100-150 ms) do vary more for the fast peaks obtained in GC X GC/qMS operation, than with TOFMS, in general adequate spectral matching with the library can be achieved. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33749524371&origin=inward&txGid=bae195279ce834007fea0a40666f5b7c
U2 - 10.1002/rcm.2665
DO - 10.1002/rcm.2665
M3 - Article
SN - 0951-4198
VL - 20
SP - 2823
EP - 2836
JO - Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
JF - Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
IS - 19
ER -