COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR GENERATION AND ABSORPTION OF WATER WAVES

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The knowledge of water wave characteristics (generation, propagation, transformation and breaking) is fundamental for hydrodynamic studies and the design of ocean, coastal and port structures. In addition to the small-scale experimental studies, the use of numerical models is also a very important tool in hydrodynamic studies. To have reliable numerical results a proper validation is required. The main objective of this paper is to compare different methods of wave generation and wave absorption in a numerical flume, and to find what is the most suited to simulate non-breaking regular wave propagation in a two-dimensional flume in deep water condition. The numerical simulations were made using the OpenFOAM® software package. Two solvers, waves2Foam and IHFoam/OlaFlow, the utility GroovyBC and a mesh stretching technique are compared. These numerical codes solve the transient Navier-Stokes equations and use a VoF (Volume of Fluid) method to identify the free surface. A solution dependence study with the methods of wave generation and wave absorption is presented. The results are also compared with the theoretical wave and experimental data. The results show that the different methods of generation produce waves similar to the theoretical and the experimental ones, only slightly differences were visible. The three method of wave dissipation considered produce very different results: IHFoam/OlaFlow is not able to dissipate the wave tested; the mesh stretching technique is able to dissipate the waves but produces a water level rise; the waves2Foam solver is able to dissipate properly the wave tested.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-77
JournalEngenharia Térmica (Thermal Engineering)
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

water wave
wave generation
hydrodynamics
method
comparison
Navier-Stokes equations
wave propagation
dissipation
water level
experimental study
deep water
software
fluid
ocean

Keywords

  • OpenFOAM
  • interFoam
  • IHFoam/OlaFlow
  • waves2Foam
  • GroovyBC
  • regular wave

Cite this

@article{3e044569531044fa8fdf23dc6e3e2dfd,
title = "COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR GENERATION AND ABSORPTION OF WATER WAVES",
abstract = "The knowledge of water wave characteristics (generation, propagation, transformation and breaking) is fundamental for hydrodynamic studies and the design of ocean, coastal and port structures. In addition to the small-scale experimental studies, the use of numerical models is also a very important tool in hydrodynamic studies. To have reliable numerical results a proper validation is required. The main objective of this paper is to compare different methods of wave generation and wave absorption in a numerical flume, and to find what is the most suited to simulate non-breaking regular wave propagation in a two-dimensional flume in deep water condition. The numerical simulations were made using the OpenFOAM{\circledR} software package. Two solvers, waves2Foam and IHFoam/OlaFlow, the utility GroovyBC and a mesh stretching technique are compared. These numerical codes solve the transient Navier-Stokes equations and use a VoF (Volume of Fluid) method to identify the free surface. A solution dependence study with the methods of wave generation and wave absorption is presented. The results are also compared with the theoretical wave and experimental data. The results show that the different methods of generation produce waves similar to the theoretical and the experimental ones, only slightly differences were visible. The three method of wave dissipation considered produce very different results: IHFoam/OlaFlow is not able to dissipate the wave tested; the mesh stretching technique is able to dissipate the waves but produces a water level rise; the waves2Foam solver is able to dissipate properly the wave tested.",
keywords = "OpenFOAM, interFoam, IHFoam/OlaFlow, waves2Foam, GroovyBC, regular wave",
author = "Conde, {Jos{\'e} Manuel Paix{\~a}o}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.5380/reterm.v18i1.67053",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "71--77",
journal = "Engenharia T{\'e}rmica (Thermal Engineering)",
issn = "1676-1790",
publisher = "Associa{\cc}{\~a}o Brasileira de Ci{\^e}ncias Mec{\^a}nicas, ABCM",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR GENERATION AND ABSORPTION OF WATER WAVES

AU - Conde, José Manuel Paixão

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The knowledge of water wave characteristics (generation, propagation, transformation and breaking) is fundamental for hydrodynamic studies and the design of ocean, coastal and port structures. In addition to the small-scale experimental studies, the use of numerical models is also a very important tool in hydrodynamic studies. To have reliable numerical results a proper validation is required. The main objective of this paper is to compare different methods of wave generation and wave absorption in a numerical flume, and to find what is the most suited to simulate non-breaking regular wave propagation in a two-dimensional flume in deep water condition. The numerical simulations were made using the OpenFOAM® software package. Two solvers, waves2Foam and IHFoam/OlaFlow, the utility GroovyBC and a mesh stretching technique are compared. These numerical codes solve the transient Navier-Stokes equations and use a VoF (Volume of Fluid) method to identify the free surface. A solution dependence study with the methods of wave generation and wave absorption is presented. The results are also compared with the theoretical wave and experimental data. The results show that the different methods of generation produce waves similar to the theoretical and the experimental ones, only slightly differences were visible. The three method of wave dissipation considered produce very different results: IHFoam/OlaFlow is not able to dissipate the wave tested; the mesh stretching technique is able to dissipate the waves but produces a water level rise; the waves2Foam solver is able to dissipate properly the wave tested.

AB - The knowledge of water wave characteristics (generation, propagation, transformation and breaking) is fundamental for hydrodynamic studies and the design of ocean, coastal and port structures. In addition to the small-scale experimental studies, the use of numerical models is also a very important tool in hydrodynamic studies. To have reliable numerical results a proper validation is required. The main objective of this paper is to compare different methods of wave generation and wave absorption in a numerical flume, and to find what is the most suited to simulate non-breaking regular wave propagation in a two-dimensional flume in deep water condition. The numerical simulations were made using the OpenFOAM® software package. Two solvers, waves2Foam and IHFoam/OlaFlow, the utility GroovyBC and a mesh stretching technique are compared. These numerical codes solve the transient Navier-Stokes equations and use a VoF (Volume of Fluid) method to identify the free surface. A solution dependence study with the methods of wave generation and wave absorption is presented. The results are also compared with the theoretical wave and experimental data. The results show that the different methods of generation produce waves similar to the theoretical and the experimental ones, only slightly differences were visible. The three method of wave dissipation considered produce very different results: IHFoam/OlaFlow is not able to dissipate the wave tested; the mesh stretching technique is able to dissipate the waves but produces a water level rise; the waves2Foam solver is able to dissipate properly the wave tested.

KW - OpenFOAM

KW - interFoam

KW - IHFoam/OlaFlow

KW - waves2Foam

KW - GroovyBC

KW - regular wave

U2 - 10.5380/reterm.v18i1.67053

DO - 10.5380/reterm.v18i1.67053

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 71

EP - 77

JO - Engenharia Térmica (Thermal Engineering)

JF - Engenharia Térmica (Thermal Engineering)

SN - 1676-1790

IS - 1

ER -