TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients
T2 - Data from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register, Reuma.pt
AU - Romão, Vasco C.
AU - Santos, Maria José
AU - Polido-Pereira, Joaquim
AU - Duarte, Cátia
AU - Nero, Patrícia
AU - Miguel, Cláudia
AU - Costa, José António
AU - Bernardes, Miguel
AU - Pimentel-Santos, Fernando M.
AU - Barcelos, Filipe
AU - Costa, Maria Lúcia
AU - Melo Gomes, José António
AU - Pereira Da Silva, José Alberto
AU - Branco, Jaime da Cunha
AU - Canas da Silva, José
AU - Pereira Da Silva, José António
AU - Fonseca, João Eurico
AU - Canhão, Helena
AU - Shi, Guixiu
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Objectives. To compare the effectiveness of TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, according to different response criteria. Methods. We included RA patients registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register treated with TNFi or tocilizumab for at least 6 months, between January 2008 and July 2013. We assessed remission/low disease activity (LDA) at 6 months according to DAS28, CDAI, and SDAI, as well as Boolean ACR/EULAR remission and EULAR response rate, adjusting for measured confounders. Results. Tocilizumab-treated patients (n = 95) presented higher baseline disease activity and were less frequently naïve to biologics compared to TNFi users (n = 429). Multivariate logistic regression analysis including the propensity score for receiving tocilizumab showed that patients treated with tocilizumab were more likely to achieve remission or LDA according to DAS28 (OR = 11.0/6.2, 95% CI 5.6-21.6/3.2-12.0), CDAI (OR = 2.8/2.6, 95% CI 1.2-6.5/1.3-5.5), or SDAI (OR = 3.6/2.5, 95% CI 1.5-8.7/1.1-5.5), as well as a good EULAR response (OR = 6.4, 95% CI 3.4-12.0). However, both groups did not differ in Boolean remission (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 0.8-4.8) or good/moderate EULAR response (OR = 1.8, 95% CI 0.8-4.5). Conclusions. Compared with TNFi, tocilizumab was associated with greater likelihood of achieving DAS28, CDAI, and SDAI remission/LDA and EULAR good response. Boolean remission and EULAR good/moderate response did not differ significantly between groups.
AB - Objectives. To compare the effectiveness of TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, according to different response criteria. Methods. We included RA patients registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register treated with TNFi or tocilizumab for at least 6 months, between January 2008 and July 2013. We assessed remission/low disease activity (LDA) at 6 months according to DAS28, CDAI, and SDAI, as well as Boolean ACR/EULAR remission and EULAR response rate, adjusting for measured confounders. Results. Tocilizumab-treated patients (n = 95) presented higher baseline disease activity and were less frequently naïve to biologics compared to TNFi users (n = 429). Multivariate logistic regression analysis including the propensity score for receiving tocilizumab showed that patients treated with tocilizumab were more likely to achieve remission or LDA according to DAS28 (OR = 11.0/6.2, 95% CI 5.6-21.6/3.2-12.0), CDAI (OR = 2.8/2.6, 95% CI 1.2-6.5/1.3-5.5), or SDAI (OR = 3.6/2.5, 95% CI 1.5-8.7/1.1-5.5), as well as a good EULAR response (OR = 6.4, 95% CI 3.4-12.0). However, both groups did not differ in Boolean remission (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 0.8-4.8) or good/moderate EULAR response (OR = 1.8, 95% CI 0.8-4.5). Conclusions. Compared with TNFi, tocilizumab was associated with greater likelihood of achieving DAS28, CDAI, and SDAI remission/LDA and EULAR good response. Boolean remission and EULAR good/moderate response did not differ significantly between groups.
KW - INTERLEUKIN-6 RECEPTOR INHIBITION
KW - DRUG SURVIVAL
KW - DOUBLE-BLIND
KW - ADALIMUMAB
KW - REMISSION
KW - EFFICACY
KW - TRIAL
KW - ETANERCEPT
KW - INFLIXIMAB
KW - SAFETY
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929346565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2015/279890
DO - 10.1155/2015/279890
M3 - Article
C2 - 26000286
AN - SCOPUS:84929346565
SN - 2314-6133
VL - 2015
SP - Online
JO - BioMed Research International
JF - BioMed Research International
M1 - 279890
ER -