Comparative assessment of mechanical, chemical and electrochemical procedures for conservation of historical lead

Teresa Palomar, Emilio Cano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Lead has a good resistance to atmospheric corrosion because it forms adherent, uniform and protective layers which prevent the corrosion advancement. Nevertheless, the exposure to the acetic and formic acids – emitted by wood and other materials used in museums’ showcases, cabinets and storehouses – induces a corrosion process which can damage the surface of the objects. In order to improve their conservation, restorers apply different conservation treatments which depends on the degree of corrosion, the products formed, the skills of the conservator and the access to specific equipment, if is required. With the aim of evaluating the impact of successive conservation treatments on lead surface and assessing their efficiency, four usual treatments for lead were selected and six cycles of alteration and treatment were carried out. The assessed procedures were mechanical cleaning (suspension of CaCO3), chemical cleaning (immersion on EDTA solution) and two electrochemical treatments (potentiostatic reduction, and potentiostatic reduction followed by passivation). The samples were characterized before and after each treatment with gravimetry, colorimetry, rugosimetry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The effects observed on lead coupons depended on each treatment procedure. The mechanical cleaning with CaCO3 produced a significant mass loss and it left an irregular surface due to the granulometry of the abrasive. Additionally, it experienced a fast re-alteration. Chemical cleaning with EDTA produced moderate mass and gloss losses due to the etching of the metallic surface after successive cycles. However, the color of the samples was the closest to the original one. Finally, the electrochemical reductions produced a scarce mass loss and a slow re-alteration, although they produced crystalline deposits on the surface which modified the color of the coupons towards bluish hues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-44
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Cultural Heritage
Volume30
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Conservation
Lead
Chemical cleaning
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
Corrosion
Edetic Acid
Cleaning
Formates
Color
Colorimetry
Atmospheric corrosion
Gravimetric analysis
Formic acid
Museums
Abrasives
Passivation
Acetic acid
Acetic Acid
Etching
Suspensions

Keywords

  • Alteration
  • Cleaning methods
  • Conservation
  • Electrochemical reduction
  • Lead

Cite this

@article{1a3c6bf6bf7a4d8ea45001eec8bd94e4,
title = "Comparative assessment of mechanical, chemical and electrochemical procedures for conservation of historical lead",
abstract = "Lead has a good resistance to atmospheric corrosion because it forms adherent, uniform and protective layers which prevent the corrosion advancement. Nevertheless, the exposure to the acetic and formic acids – emitted by wood and other materials used in museums’ showcases, cabinets and storehouses – induces a corrosion process which can damage the surface of the objects. In order to improve their conservation, restorers apply different conservation treatments which depends on the degree of corrosion, the products formed, the skills of the conservator and the access to specific equipment, if is required. With the aim of evaluating the impact of successive conservation treatments on lead surface and assessing their efficiency, four usual treatments for lead were selected and six cycles of alteration and treatment were carried out. The assessed procedures were mechanical cleaning (suspension of CaCO3), chemical cleaning (immersion on EDTA solution) and two electrochemical treatments (potentiostatic reduction, and potentiostatic reduction followed by passivation). The samples were characterized before and after each treatment with gravimetry, colorimetry, rugosimetry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The effects observed on lead coupons depended on each treatment procedure. The mechanical cleaning with CaCO3 produced a significant mass loss and it left an irregular surface due to the granulometry of the abrasive. Additionally, it experienced a fast re-alteration. Chemical cleaning with EDTA produced moderate mass and gloss losses due to the etching of the metallic surface after successive cycles. However, the color of the samples was the closest to the original one. Finally, the electrochemical reductions produced a scarce mass loss and a slow re-alteration, although they produced crystalline deposits on the surface which modified the color of the coupons towards bluish hues.",
keywords = "Alteration, Cleaning methods, Conservation, Electrochemical reduction, Lead",
author = "Teresa Palomar and Emilio Cano",
note = "This work has been partially funded by CREMELII Project Ref. HAR2014-54893-R, GEOMATERIALES 2-CM Program Ref. S2013/MIT-2914 and the Fundacao do Ministerio de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Portugal (Post-doctoral grant ref. SFRH/BPD/108403/2015).",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.culher.2017.10.010",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "34--44",
journal = "Journal of Cultural Heritage",
issn = "1296-2074",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.",

}

Comparative assessment of mechanical, chemical and electrochemical procedures for conservation of historical lead. / Palomar, Teresa; Cano, Emilio.

In: Journal of Cultural Heritage, Vol. 30, 01.03.2018, p. 34-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative assessment of mechanical, chemical and electrochemical procedures for conservation of historical lead

AU - Palomar, Teresa

AU - Cano, Emilio

N1 - This work has been partially funded by CREMELII Project Ref. HAR2014-54893-R, GEOMATERIALES 2-CM Program Ref. S2013/MIT-2914 and the Fundacao do Ministerio de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Portugal (Post-doctoral grant ref. SFRH/BPD/108403/2015).

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Lead has a good resistance to atmospheric corrosion because it forms adherent, uniform and protective layers which prevent the corrosion advancement. Nevertheless, the exposure to the acetic and formic acids – emitted by wood and other materials used in museums’ showcases, cabinets and storehouses – induces a corrosion process which can damage the surface of the objects. In order to improve their conservation, restorers apply different conservation treatments which depends on the degree of corrosion, the products formed, the skills of the conservator and the access to specific equipment, if is required. With the aim of evaluating the impact of successive conservation treatments on lead surface and assessing their efficiency, four usual treatments for lead were selected and six cycles of alteration and treatment were carried out. The assessed procedures were mechanical cleaning (suspension of CaCO3), chemical cleaning (immersion on EDTA solution) and two electrochemical treatments (potentiostatic reduction, and potentiostatic reduction followed by passivation). The samples were characterized before and after each treatment with gravimetry, colorimetry, rugosimetry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The effects observed on lead coupons depended on each treatment procedure. The mechanical cleaning with CaCO3 produced a significant mass loss and it left an irregular surface due to the granulometry of the abrasive. Additionally, it experienced a fast re-alteration. Chemical cleaning with EDTA produced moderate mass and gloss losses due to the etching of the metallic surface after successive cycles. However, the color of the samples was the closest to the original one. Finally, the electrochemical reductions produced a scarce mass loss and a slow re-alteration, although they produced crystalline deposits on the surface which modified the color of the coupons towards bluish hues.

AB - Lead has a good resistance to atmospheric corrosion because it forms adherent, uniform and protective layers which prevent the corrosion advancement. Nevertheless, the exposure to the acetic and formic acids – emitted by wood and other materials used in museums’ showcases, cabinets and storehouses – induces a corrosion process which can damage the surface of the objects. In order to improve their conservation, restorers apply different conservation treatments which depends on the degree of corrosion, the products formed, the skills of the conservator and the access to specific equipment, if is required. With the aim of evaluating the impact of successive conservation treatments on lead surface and assessing their efficiency, four usual treatments for lead were selected and six cycles of alteration and treatment were carried out. The assessed procedures were mechanical cleaning (suspension of CaCO3), chemical cleaning (immersion on EDTA solution) and two electrochemical treatments (potentiostatic reduction, and potentiostatic reduction followed by passivation). The samples were characterized before and after each treatment with gravimetry, colorimetry, rugosimetry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The effects observed on lead coupons depended on each treatment procedure. The mechanical cleaning with CaCO3 produced a significant mass loss and it left an irregular surface due to the granulometry of the abrasive. Additionally, it experienced a fast re-alteration. Chemical cleaning with EDTA produced moderate mass and gloss losses due to the etching of the metallic surface after successive cycles. However, the color of the samples was the closest to the original one. Finally, the electrochemical reductions produced a scarce mass loss and a slow re-alteration, although they produced crystalline deposits on the surface which modified the color of the coupons towards bluish hues.

KW - Alteration

KW - Cleaning methods

KW - Conservation

KW - Electrochemical reduction

KW - Lead

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035103457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.culher.2017.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.culher.2017.10.010

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 34

EP - 44

JO - Journal of Cultural Heritage

JF - Journal of Cultural Heritage

SN - 1296-2074

ER -