Comparative analyses reveal discrepancies among results of commonly used methods for Anopheles gambiae molecular form identification.

F. Santolamazza , B. Caputo, M. Calzetta , J.L. Vicente, E. Mancini , V. Petrarca , J Pinto, A. Della Torre

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

19 Downloads (Pure)

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

@article{5840a7ef422b4670a2b1881d89ccc054,

title = "Comparative analyses reveal discrepancies among results of commonly used methods for Anopheles gambiae molecular form identification.",

author = "F. Santolamazza and B. Caputo and M. Calzetta and J.L. Vicente and E. Mancini and V. Petrarca and J Pinto and {Della Torre}, A.",

year = "2011",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1186/1475-2875-10-215",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

pages = "215",

journal = "Malaria Journal",

publisher = "BioMed Central (BMC)",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative analyses reveal discrepancies among results of commonly used methods for Anopheles gambiae molecular form identification.

AU - Santolamazza , F.

AU - Caputo, B.

AU - Calzetta , M.

AU - Vicente, J.L.

AU - Mancini , E.

AU - Petrarca , V.

AU - Pinto, J

AU - Della Torre, A.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

U2 - 10.1186/1475-2875-10-215

DO - 10.1186/1475-2875-10-215

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 215

JO - Malaria Journal

JF - Malaria Journal

ER -